Dynasty Company for Oil and Gas Trading Limited <i>v.</i> Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq and Dr Ashti Hawrami

666 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — State Immunity Act 1978 — Kurdistan Regional Government — Production Sharing Contract for oil and gas in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq — Consent to change in control of private company — Suit against constituent territories and separate entities — Whether a constituent territory of a recognized State entitled to immunity —Whether agents and servants of States, constituent territories of States and separate entities entitled to immunity — Acta jure imperii — Orders in Council under Section 14 of State Immunity Act 1978 — Sovereign authority under State Immunity Act 1978 — Constitution of State as source of sovereign authority — Pearl Petroleum Co. Ltd v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq — Service on agents of States, constituent territories and separate entities — Doctrine of foreign act of State — Forum non conveniens — Stay of proceedings States — Federal States — Constituent territories — Iraq — Kurdistan Region — Immunity — The law of England

Publication Details

Journal
International Law Reports
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ilr.2024.91
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynasty Company for Oil and Gas Trading Limited v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq and Dr Ashti Hawrami

International Law Reports
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Dynasty Company for Oil and Gas Trading Limited v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq and Dr Ashti Hawrami

article en

Abstract

666 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — State Immunity Act 1978 — Kurdistan Regional Government — Production Sharing Contract for oil and gas in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq — Consent to change in control of private company — Suit against constituent territories and separate entities — Whether a constituent territory of a recognized State entitled to immunity —Whether agents and servants of States, constituent territories of States and separate entities entitled to immunity — Acta jure imperii — Orders in Council under Section 14 of State Immunity Act 1978 — Sovereign authority under State Immunity Act 1978 — Constitution of State as source of sovereign authority — Pearl Petroleum Co. Ltd v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq — Service on agents of States, constituent territories and separate entities — Doctrine of foreign act of State — Forum non conveniens — Stay of proceedings States — Federal States — Constituent territories — Iraq — Kurdistan Region — Immunity — The law of England

International Law ReportsVol. 209
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.