The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities

Abstract In the 1980s, postmodernism posed a series of critiques against the social sciences and humanities, with anthropology being a prominent target. Although these critiques never prevented the continued development of the social sciences and humanities, the conundrum constituted by the “subject” and “subjectivity” remained unresolved. At its core, the methodological challenge facing the social sciences and humanities lies in the question of whether it is possible for a human (researcher) to study other humans living under different institutions (e.g., varying kinship institutions). Drawing on the researcher’s firsthand ethnographic fieldwork experiences, this study analyses and critiques the questions and solutions proposed by postmodernism through two key dimensions: fieldwork practice and methodology. The objective is to resolve this dilemma, thereby advancing the epistemological foundations of the social sciences and humanities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-025-00135-9
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities

Hua Cai
International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities

Hua Cai
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the 1980s, postmodernism posed a series of critiques against the social sciences and humanities, with anthropology being a prominent target. Although these critiques never prevented the continued development of the social sciences and humanities, the conundrum constituted by the “subject” and “subjectivity” remained unresolved. At its core, the methodological challenge facing the social sciences and humanities lies in the question of whether it is possible for a human (researcher) to study other humans living under different institutions (e.g., varying kinship institutions). Drawing on the researcher’s firsthand ethnographic fieldwork experiences, this study analyses and critiques the questions and solutions proposed by postmodernism through two key dimensions: fieldwork practice and methodology. The objective is to resolve this dilemma, thereby advancing the epistemological foundations of the social sciences and humanities.

International Journal of Anthropology and EthnologyVol. 9(1)
King University (US), Peking University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities — Hua Cai · International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS