A Multidimensional Model of Social Autistic Function and Its Effects on Quality of Life

Background: The social interaction styles of autistic individuals are determined by neural differences across multiple brain systems, and these are not necessarily pathological in nature or entirely specific for autism. Interventions that aim to modulate social function to simulate more neurotypical behavior can be detrimental to self-acceptance and quality of life (QoL). Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to test contributions of six specific social dimensions to the autistic neurotype and then use causal inference to identify which of them have adverse effects on QoL. Such autism-relevant dimensions that impact QoL may be more useful as intervention targets than more global autistic characteristics. Methods: We quantified individual differences in multiple dimensions of socially relevant functions (social anhedonia, theory of mind, affective empathy, social anxiety, prosopagnosia, and alexithymia), as well as confounding constructs, using validated questionnaires in a sample of 366 adults with a wide range of autistic traits (ATs), including 78 with diagnosed autism. We first used Bayesian linear regression to identify the most likely predictive model of social ATs. Then, we constructed a causal model with a sufficient adjustment set to estimate the differential roles of the constructs in lowering QoL. Results: We found that 76% of variance in social ATs was explained by a combination of social anhedonia, theory of mind differences, social anxiety, alexithymia, and face blindness, while individual differences in affective empathy did not contribute. However, only alexithymia and social anhedonia were found to adversely affect QoL. Conclusion: We suggest that autistic social function can be explained by variation across multiple dimensions that are more specific, neurally and behaviorally, than the broad AT construct. There were autism/AT-related differences across most tested dimensions, but QoL was disproportionately affected by alexithymia and social anhedonia, suggesting that these transdiagnostic constructs are relevant markers of poor outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0262
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multidimensional Model of Social Autistic Function and Its Effects on Quality of Life

Johan Pieslinger, Kajsa Igelström, Erik Igelström
Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

A Multidimensional Model of Social Autistic Function and Its Effects on Quality of Life

Johan Pieslinger, Kajsa Igelström, Erik Igelström
article en

Abstract

Background: The social interaction styles of autistic individuals are determined by neural differences across multiple brain systems, and these are not necessarily pathological in nature or entirely specific for autism. Interventions that aim to modulate social function to simulate more neurotypical behavior can be detrimental to self-acceptance and quality of life (QoL). Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to test contributions of six specific social dimensions to the autistic neurotype and then use causal inference to identify which of them have adverse effects on QoL. Such autism-relevant dimensions that impact QoL may be more useful as intervention targets than more global autistic characteristics. Methods: We quantified individual differences in multiple dimensions of socially relevant functions (social anhedonia, theory of mind, affective empathy, social anxiety, prosopagnosia, and alexithymia), as well as confounding constructs, using validated questionnaires in a sample of 366 adults with a wide range of autistic traits (ATs), including 78 with diagnosed autism. We first used Bayesian linear regression to identify the most likely predictive model of social ATs. Then, we constructed a causal model with a sufficient adjustment set to estimate the differential roles of the constructs in lowering QoL. Results: We found that 76% of variance in social ATs was explained by a combination of social anhedonia, theory of mind differences, social anxiety, alexithymia, and face blindness, while individual differences in affective empathy did not contribute. However, only alexithymia and social anhedonia were found to adversely affect QoL. Conclusion: We suggest that autistic social function can be explained by variation across multiple dimensions that are more specific, neurally and behaviorally, than the broad AT construct. There were autism/AT-related differences across most tested dimensions, but QoL was disproportionately affected by alexithymia and social anhedonia, suggesting that these transdiagnostic constructs are relevant markers of poor outcomes.

Autism in Adulthood
Linköping University (SE), MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.