Donald Trump and Hostess CupCakes: Distinguishing the persisting sources of Trump's popular support, 2015–2025

This is an unusual time in U.S. politics, to say the least. Over the past 10 years or so a politics of reactionary mass resentment has built up in which the targets vary from threatening cultural changes and economic decline to government itself, and fear of immigrants upsetting historic demographic patterns. Collectively, the people in question have found their voice in one man: Donald Trump. Similar trends are noticeable worldwide. How to understand how this has happened in the United States seems particularly difficult. There has been no major recent disaster as such to incite such a dramatic change. Furthermore, the United States, the self-declared defender of liberal democracy, has twice now elected as president someone clearly antithetical in goals and rhetoric to that cause. A proponent of national capitalism organized around his whims is now the apparent alternative to the global capitalism long supported by U.S. governments of both major political parties. Why would people flock in significant numbers to support such a path? It has been difficult to account for Trump's support in conventional sociodemographic categories such as social class or age group. This article uses an alternative approach based on a variety of sources that then adopts a popular U.S. baked good—Hostess CupCakes—to identify three broad groupings of supporters: Ding Dongs, Ho Hos, and Twinkies. Their disparate resentments and logics of attachment come together in the retribution their leader promises to deliver to those whom they see as at the root of their displeasures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Geography
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786251353590
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Donald Trump and Hostess CupCakes: Distinguishing the persisting sources of Trump's popular support, 2015–2025

John Agnew
1 citations
Human Geography
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
article

Donald Trump and Hostess CupCakes: Distinguishing the persisting sources of Trump's popular support, 2015–2025

John Agnew
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This is an unusual time in U.S. politics, to say the least. Over the past 10 years or so a politics of reactionary mass resentment has built up in which the targets vary from threatening cultural changes and economic decline to government itself, and fear of immigrants upsetting historic demographic patterns. Collectively, the people in question have found their voice in one man: Donald Trump. Similar trends are noticeable worldwide. How to understand how this has happened in the United States seems particularly difficult. There has been no major recent disaster as such to incite such a dramatic change. Furthermore, the United States, the self-declared defender of liberal democracy, has twice now elected as president someone clearly antithetical in goals and rhetoric to that cause. A proponent of national capitalism organized around his whims is now the apparent alternative to the global capitalism long supported by U.S. governments of both major political parties. Why would people flock in significant numbers to support such a path? It has been difficult to account for Trump's support in conventional sociodemographic categories such as social class or age group. This article uses an alternative approach based on a variety of sources that then adopts a popular U.S. baked good—Hostess CupCakes—to identify three broad groupings of supporters: Ding Dongs, Ho Hos, and Twinkies. Their disparate resentments and logics of attachment come together in the retribution their leader promises to deliver to those whom they see as at the root of their displeasures.

Human GeographyVol. 19(1)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.