Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes

<b>Introduction:</b> Oncoplastic breast reconstruction (OBR) combines breast conservation treatment with breast reduction/reconstruction and is appropriate for breast cancer patients with macromastia and/or ptosis, who want to avoid mastectomy, and who include breast reduction in their goals. This study's purpose was to evaluate complications and patient-reported outcomes associated with OBR at our institution. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted for all consecutive OBR cases from April 2009 to April 2020. Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database and surgeons' EMRs. Risk factors for any complication were evaluated by a univariate logistic regression analysis with significance level set at P < 0.05. Postoperative patient satisfaction was evaluated with the validated BREAST-Q 2.0 questionnaire for which raw scores were obtained. Rasch-transformed scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) were calculated from the BREAST-Q conversion tables. <b>Results:</b> 81 patients had OBR of whom 22 experienced 25 post-surgical complications. Increasing ipsilateral and contralateral specimen weight and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System Score (ASA) were significantly correlated with increased odds for any complication. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was completed post-OBR by 37 patients who reported a high degree of satisfaction with physicians, medical, and office staff. <b>Conclusions:</b> OBR is rated well by patients. All complications were Clavien-Dindo 1 and managed with local office-based wound care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251350906
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Yi Chen, Kathryn V. Isaac, Elaine McKevitt, Mabel Zhang et al.
1 citations
Plastic Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
article

Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Yi Chen, Kathryn V. Isaac, Elaine McKevitt, Mabel Zhang, Urve Kuusk, Rebecca Warburton, Amy Bazzarelli, Jin‐Si Pao, Shivani Mysuria, Carol Dingee, Nancy Van Laeken, Esta S. Bovill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Oncoplastic breast reconstruction (OBR) combines breast conservation treatment with breast reduction/reconstruction and is appropriate for breast cancer patients with macromastia and/or ptosis, who want to avoid mastectomy, and who include breast reduction in their goals. This study's purpose was to evaluate complications and patient-reported outcomes associated with OBR at our institution. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted for all consecutive OBR cases from April 2009 to April 2020. Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database and surgeons' EMRs. Risk factors for any complication were evaluated by a univariate logistic regression analysis with significance level set at P < 0.05. Postoperative patient satisfaction was evaluated with the validated BREAST-Q 2.0 questionnaire for which raw scores were obtained. Rasch-transformed scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) were calculated from the BREAST-Q conversion tables. <b>Results:</b> 81 patients had OBR of whom 22 experienced 25 post-surgical complications. Increasing ipsilateral and contralateral specimen weight and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System Score (ASA) were significantly correlated with increased odds for any complication. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was completed post-OBR by 37 patients who reported a high degree of satisfaction with physicians, medical, and office staff. <b>Conclusions:</b> OBR is rated well by patients. All complications were Clavien-Dindo 1 and managed with local office-based wound care.

Plastic Surgery
University of British Columbia (CA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.