“So much worse for the facts(?)” – Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophers and the Common Experience of Reaction

The article presents a selection of considerations by fourteenth-century Oxford and Paris scholars on the phenomena of common experience that seemingly confirm the occurrence of processes of reaction in rerum natura. All of the philosophers involved, however, attempted to explain these phenomena in such a way that allowed them to defend the statement of Aristotle that it is impossible that there be any such reaction, between either elementary or mixed bodies (mixta). On the basis of the explanations provided by these thinkers,one can arrive at the conclusion that they were simply unable to leave the boundaries of the Aristotelian worldview, at least with respect to the issue of mutual action of elementary bodies. In the final section of the article the plausible reasons for their attitude towards these phenomena of common experience are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18290/rf25732.8
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“So much worse for the facts(?)” – Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophers and the Common Experience of Reaction

Robert Podkoński
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

“So much worse for the facts(?)” – Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophers and the Common Experience of Reaction

Robert Podkoński
article en

Abstract

The article presents a selection of considerations by fourteenth-century Oxford and Paris scholars on the phenomena of common experience that seemingly confirm the occurrence of processes of reaction in rerum natura. All of the philosophers involved, however, attempted to explain these phenomena in such a way that allowed them to defend the statement of Aristotle that it is impossible that there be any such reaction, between either elementary or mixed bodies (mixta). On the basis of the explanations provided by these thinkers,one can arrive at the conclusion that they were simply unable to leave the boundaries of the Aristotelian worldview, at least with respect to the issue of mutual action of elementary bodies. In the final section of the article the plausible reasons for their attitude towards these phenomena of common experience are provided.

Roczniki FilozoficzneVol. 73(2)
University of Łódź (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.