Optimizing Stem Curriculum Design through Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Personalized Learning Algorithms in Secondary Education

The research compares AI-driven personalized learning algorithms and traditional learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics curriculum design optimization, with emphasis on secondary-level biology class in West Wendover High School, Nevada, United States. Using a two-shot quasi-experimental design, the research investigates the academic performance of Grade 10 students, a sample size of (n=60) who are divided into an experimental group (AI-driven learning) and a control group (traditional learning). Pre and post-tests assessed student performance in two biology units studied—Energy in the Ecosystem and Heredity and Variation— while surveys tracked the influence of student engagement, prior knowledge, and learning preferences on AI-driven learning effectiveness. Paired and independent sample t-tests were used to compare the two groups. Results show that the AI group participants' post-tests were considerably higher, with high levels of mastery (83.0% for Unit 3 and 90.9% for Unit 4), in contrast with the moderate mastery of the traditional group (69.2% for Unit 3 and 70.9% for Unit 4). Paired and independent samples t-tests statistical analysis proved to the superiority of AI-driven learning compared to traditional learning in terms of improving academic performance, particularly in complex subjects like genetics, heredity, and variation. Besides, AI-driven learning improved learners' engagement by facilitating real-time feedback, adaptive learning paths, and interactive digital tools, while the study highlights the importance of consolidating foundational knowledge alongside AI integration. The paper concludes that AI-driven personalized learning considerably improves STEM learning because it meets personal learning requirements, stimulates interest, and makes complex ideas simpler. For optimum AI-driven teaching, though, STEM curricula should integrate personalized AI-driven with interactive, peer-to-peer learning exercises to promote greater conceptual comprehension. Based on these findings, this study recommends the use of AI-driven tools in STEM courses, the development of advanced adaptive learning features, and the implementation of hybrid approaches to AI-driven and traditional learning. It also recommends district leaders, curriculum designers, and instructors to explore AI-driven personalized learning to enhance curriculum optimization and continue researching to design and test these methods for large-scale implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i61075
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Stem Curriculum Design through Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Personalized Learning Algorithms in Secondary Education

Emerson B. Cuzzamu, Arman Serrano, Armando Solis Vinoya, Jose Emmanuel C. Mandapat
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports
Engineering Education and Technology
article

Optimizing Stem Curriculum Design through Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Personalized Learning Algorithms in Secondary Education

Emerson B. Cuzzamu, Arman Serrano, Armando Solis Vinoya, Jose Emmanuel C. Mandapat
article en

Abstract

The research compares AI-driven personalized learning algorithms and traditional learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics curriculum design optimization, with emphasis on secondary-level biology class in West Wendover High School, Nevada, United States. Using a two-shot quasi-experimental design, the research investigates the academic performance of Grade 10 students, a sample size of (n=60) who are divided into an experimental group (AI-driven learning) and a control group (traditional learning). Pre and post-tests assessed student performance in two biology units studied—Energy in the Ecosystem and Heredity and Variation— while surveys tracked the influence of student engagement, prior knowledge, and learning preferences on AI-driven learning effectiveness. Paired and independent sample t-tests were used to compare the two groups. Results show that the AI group participants' post-tests were considerably higher, with high levels of mastery (83.0% for Unit 3 and 90.9% for Unit 4), in contrast with the moderate mastery of the traditional group (69.2% for Unit 3 and 70.9% for Unit 4). Paired and independent samples t-tests statistical analysis proved to the superiority of AI-driven learning compared to traditional learning in terms of improving academic performance, particularly in complex subjects like genetics, heredity, and variation. Besides, AI-driven learning improved learners' engagement by facilitating real-time feedback, adaptive learning paths, and interactive digital tools, while the study highlights the importance of consolidating foundational knowledge alongside AI integration. The paper concludes that AI-driven personalized learning considerably improves STEM learning because it meets personal learning requirements, stimulates interest, and makes complex ideas simpler. For optimum AI-driven teaching, though, STEM curricula should integrate personalized AI-driven with interactive, peer-to-peer learning exercises to promote greater conceptual comprehension. Based on these findings, this study recommends the use of AI-driven tools in STEM courses, the development of advanced adaptive learning features, and the implementation of hybrid approaches to AI-driven and traditional learning. It also recommends district leaders, curriculum designers, and instructors to explore AI-driven personalized learning to enhance curriculum optimization and continue researching to design and test these methods for large-scale implementation.

Asian Journal of Advanced Research and ReportsVol. 19(6)
Tarlac State University (PH), Virgen Milagrosa University Foundation (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Engineering Education and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.