Is Digital Government Strengthening or Weakening Society?

Governments are facing technical, organizational, political, financial, etc. limitations on their capacity to tackle major policy problems like pandemics, climate change, migration, etc. that endanger societal well-being, security, and development. Overcoming such limitations requires a collective response, where different members of the society – individuals and institutions – are working with government and each other to address the problem. The aim of this paper is to examine the digital transformation of government and whether the outcome – digital government – makes society stronger or weaker, thus facilitating or undermining such collective response. To this end, we examine six qualities of social development – inclusion, equality, justice, collectivism, order and democracy – which presence or absence make societies stronger or weaker, and collect the evidence from scientific literature of digital government impacting such qualities, leading to inclusive vs. exclusive societies, equal vs unequal societies, just vs. unjust societies, etc. The result of this research is a landscape of different approaches, experiences, and designs, through which digital government contributes to the presence or absence of these qualities. This result has both research and policy implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conference on Digital Government Research
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1059
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Digital Government Strengthening or Weakening Society?

Elsa Estévez, Tomasz Janowski, David Dueñas-Cid, Grażyna Musiatowicz-Podbiał
Conference on Digital Government Research
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Is Digital Government Strengthening or Weakening Society?

Elsa Estévez, Tomasz Janowski, David Dueñas-Cid, Grażyna Musiatowicz-Podbiał
article en

Abstract

Governments are facing technical, organizational, political, financial, etc. limitations on their capacity to tackle major policy problems like pandemics, climate change, migration, etc. that endanger societal well-being, security, and development. Overcoming such limitations requires a collective response, where different members of the society – individuals and institutions – are working with government and each other to address the problem. The aim of this paper is to examine the digital transformation of government and whether the outcome – digital government – makes society stronger or weaker, thus facilitating or undermining such collective response. To this end, we examine six qualities of social development – inclusion, equality, justice, collectivism, order and democracy – which presence or absence make societies stronger or weaker, and collect the evidence from scientific literature of digital government impacting such qualities, leading to inclusive vs. exclusive societies, equal vs unequal societies, just vs. unjust societies, etc. The result of this research is a landscape of different approaches, experiences, and designs, through which digital government contributes to the presence or absence of these qualities. This result has both research and policy implications.

Conference on Digital Government ResearchVol. 1
Kozminski University (PL), Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), University of Gdańsk (PL), Universidad Nacional del Sur (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.