Comparative Research on Vessel Navigability on the Northern Sea Route Based on the NSR Admission Criteria and POLARIS Methodology

At present, sea ice remains a critical factor affecting the safety of vessel operations along the Northern Sea Route (NSR). However, inconsistencies between the navigability outcomes derived from the criteria for the admission of ships in the area of the Northern Sea Route (NSR criteria) and the polar operational limit assessment risk indexing system (POLARIS) methodology present challenges for navigational decision-making. This study aims to conduct a systematic comparison of the POLARIS methodology and the NSR criteria in evaluating the navigability of independently operating vessels classified as Arc4 to Arc9. Through comparative calculations of navigability and the navigability rates for six ice-class vessels across 27 districts using the two methods, this study reveals the consistencies and discrepancies in their navigability outcomes. Firstly, using the POLARIS methodology, the risk index outcome (RIO) is calculated for six ice-class vessels across 27 districts. For these districts, the navigability threshold is defined when 95% or more of the area exhibits an RIO greater than or equal to zero. Secondly, using the NSR criteria, navigability ratios for six ice-class vessels under varying ice conditions are evaluated. A navigability threshold is defined when 95% or more of the ice conditions in a district are classified as navigable. Finally, a quantitative comparison of the weekly navigability ratios obtained by the two methods is conducted to reveal the consistencies and discrepancies in the navigability outcomes of each ice-class vessel across different NSR districts. The results indicate that the consistency between the navigability outcomes of the two methods decreases with lower vessel ice classes, particularly in September and March. In general, the consistency of performance between the two methods in terms of navigability outcomes deteriorates as the vessel ice class decreases and ice conditions become more complex. This study provides a scientific foundation and data-based support for route planning and real-time decision-making in polar waters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071282
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Research on Vessel Navigability on the Northern Sea Route Based on the NSR Admission Criteria and POLARIS Methodology

Jin Xue Xu, Liang Cao, Bo Xu, Long Ma et al.
3 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
12.60
article

Comparative Research on Vessel Navigability on the Northern Sea Route Based on the NSR Admission Criteria and POLARIS Methodology

Jin Xue Xu, Liang Cao, Bo Xu, Long Ma, Mou Xiao-guang, Sihan Qian, Jiemin Fan, Xiaowen Li, Yabin Li, Boxi Yao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

At present, sea ice remains a critical factor affecting the safety of vessel operations along the Northern Sea Route (NSR). However, inconsistencies between the navigability outcomes derived from the criteria for the admission of ships in the area of the Northern Sea Route (NSR criteria) and the polar operational limit assessment risk indexing system (POLARIS) methodology present challenges for navigational decision-making. This study aims to conduct a systematic comparison of the POLARIS methodology and the NSR criteria in evaluating the navigability of independently operating vessels classified as Arc4 to Arc9. Through comparative calculations of navigability and the navigability rates for six ice-class vessels across 27 districts using the two methods, this study reveals the consistencies and discrepancies in their navigability outcomes. Firstly, using the POLARIS methodology, the risk index outcome (RIO) is calculated for six ice-class vessels across 27 districts. For these districts, the navigability threshold is defined when 95% or more of the area exhibits an RIO greater than or equal to zero. Secondly, using the NSR criteria, navigability ratios for six ice-class vessels under varying ice conditions are evaluated. A navigability threshold is defined when 95% or more of the ice conditions in a district are classified as navigable. Finally, a quantitative comparison of the weekly navigability ratios obtained by the two methods is conducted to reveal the consistencies and discrepancies in the navigability outcomes of each ice-class vessel across different NSR districts. The results indicate that the consistency between the navigability outcomes of the two methods decreases with lower vessel ice classes, particularly in September and March. In general, the consistency of performance between the two methods in terms of navigability outcomes deteriorates as the vessel ice class decreases and ice conditions become more complex. This study provides a scientific foundation and data-based support for route planning and real-time decision-making in polar waters.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(7)
Guangdong Ocean University (CN)
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.