Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities: GIS-Based Public–Private Comparative Analysis Using Floating Catchment Methods

Healthcare accessibility is among the most critical challenges affecting millions, reflecting profound geospatial disparities in Latin America. This study aims to evaluate healthcare service geospatial accessibility patterns, comparing the geospatial coverage between public and private healthcare facilities in Santiago district, Panama. We first apply the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method and its extended variant (E2SFCA) to calculate geospatial accessibility indexes at public and private healthcare facilities. We then use Getis–Ord Gi* and Local Moran geospatial statistical analysis to identify significant clusters of high and low accessibility. The results reveal that public healthcare facilities still offer higher geospatial coverage than private healthcare facilities, with higher geospatial accessibility in the central zone and lower geospatial accessibility in the south zone of Santiago. These findings highlighted the location of new healthcare facilities in zones with lower geospatial accessibility coverage. This study provides reproducible methodological tools for other geographical contexts. It also contributes to improving decision-making and formulating public policies to reduce spatial disparities in healthcare services in Panama and other Caribbean and Latin American countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14070253
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities: GIS-Based Public–Private Comparative Analysis Using Floating Catchment Methods

Gregorio Rosario Michel, Onel Pérez-Fernández
5 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Urban Transport and Accessibility
10.88
article

Spatial Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities: GIS-Based Public–Private Comparative Analysis Using Floating Catchment Methods

Gregorio Rosario Michel, Onel Pérez-Fernández
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Healthcare accessibility is among the most critical challenges affecting millions, reflecting profound geospatial disparities in Latin America. This study aims to evaluate healthcare service geospatial accessibility patterns, comparing the geospatial coverage between public and private healthcare facilities in Santiago district, Panama. We first apply the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method and its extended variant (E2SFCA) to calculate geospatial accessibility indexes at public and private healthcare facilities. We then use Getis–Ord Gi* and Local Moran geospatial statistical analysis to identify significant clusters of high and low accessibility. The results reveal that public healthcare facilities still offer higher geospatial coverage than private healthcare facilities, with higher geospatial accessibility in the central zone and lower geospatial accessibility in the south zone of Santiago. These findings highlighted the location of new healthcare facilities in zones with lower geospatial accessibility coverage. This study provides reproducible methodological tools for other geographical contexts. It also contributes to improving decision-making and formulating public policies to reduce spatial disparities in healthcare services in Panama and other Caribbean and Latin American countries.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(7)
Universidad de Panamá (PA), Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo (DO), Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña (DO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
10.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.