Let’s speak the same language: a formally defined model to describe and compare payment system architectures

Proposals for new payment system architectures abound. To understand their opportunities and challenges, it is paramount to be able to describe and compare them in a consistent and standardized manner. This paper therefore proposes a formally defined model to represent three key functions of payment system architectures: issuance/withdrawal, holding and transfer of funds. The model defines payment diagrams, using a precisely defined syntax. We illustrate the application of these diagrams for domestic and cross-border account transfers, as well as cash, card, e-money and stablecoin payments. However, the payment diagrams can be used for any type of funds and can be applied across different payment system architectures. We also demonstrate how the diagrams correspond to the balance sheet approach commonly used in economics, and show that it offers added value by providing an end-to-end visualization of every stage of the payment journey. Our model provides a tool for central banks, regulators and the payment industry to better understand and compare existing and new payment system architectures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21314/jfmi.2025.004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let’s speak the same language: a formally defined model to describe and compare payment system architectures

Peter Wierts, Anneke Kosse, Kees van Hee, Jacob Wijngaard
1 citations
The Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.23
article

Let’s speak the same language: a formally defined model to describe and compare payment system architectures

Peter Wierts, Anneke Kosse, Kees van Hee, Jacob Wijngaard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Proposals for new payment system architectures abound. To understand their opportunities and challenges, it is paramount to be able to describe and compare them in a consistent and standardized manner. This paper therefore proposes a formally defined model to represent three key functions of payment system architectures: issuance/withdrawal, holding and transfer of funds. The model defines payment diagrams, using a precisely defined syntax. We illustrate the application of these diagrams for domestic and cross-border account transfers, as well as cash, card, e-money and stablecoin payments. However, the payment diagrams can be used for any type of funds and can be applied across different payment system architectures. We also demonstrate how the diagrams correspond to the balance sheet approach commonly used in economics, and show that it offers added value by providing an end-to-end visualization of every stage of the payment journey. Our model provides a tool for central banks, regulators and the payment industry to better understand and compare existing and new payment system architectures.

The Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.