Toward Assay-Aware Bioactivity Model(er)s: Getting a Grip on Biological Context

Protein-ligand interaction prediction with proteochemometric (PCM) models can provide valuable insights during early drug discovery and chemical safety assessment. These models have benefitted from the large amount of data available in bioactivity databases. However, an issue that is often overlooked when using this data is the broad diversity in the biological assays present. The effect of small molecules on a protein can be measured in various ways, and this can influence the outcome. Yet, currently there is a lack of standardized, specific assay metadata, while this could help increase understanding of the origin of data points, improve data curation, and lead to better models that are both more accurate and make predictions specific to the readout of interest. To make use of the existing information on the biological context, we set out to create and validate multiple assay descriptors and test their use in protein-ligand interaction models. Dimensionality reduction of embedded free text assay descriptions from ChEMBL showed that text embeddings capture relevant features. Additionally, clustering of these embedded descriptions groups the assays in a way that enriches purity, matches manually categorized assays, and yields sensible topic describing words. From ligand-protein combinations with multiple measurements, it becomes apparent that the deviation between different measurements in general is higher than the deviation of measurements within assay categories, with a logarithmic mean absolute deviation of 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. Incorporating this biological context into the PCM models in the form of BioBERT-based embeddings improved the average <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> from 0.67 to 0.69 across different data sets and splits. Conversely, using simpler methods such as bag-of-words (in which frequently used words are used as features) no improvement was seen (average <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> 0.66). Overall, models that integrate assay embeddings yield more accurate predictions and give the user the option to train their model on all available data yet still predict specific end points. In addition, the novel method for assay categorization described here facilitates data curation and provides a useful overview of the biological context of studied targets. In conclusion, biological assay context is important for bioactivity modeling and provides a means to easily get insight into this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00603
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Assay-Aware Bioactivity Model(er)s: Getting a Grip on Biological Context

Linde Schoenmaker, Laura H. Heitman, Willem Jespers, Joost B. Beltman et al.
7 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
article

Toward Assay-Aware Bioactivity Model(er)s: Getting a Grip on Biological Context

Linde Schoenmaker, Laura H. Heitman, Willem Jespers, Joost B. Beltman, Gerard J. P. van Westen, Enzo G. Sastrokarijo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Protein-ligand interaction prediction with proteochemometric (PCM) models can provide valuable insights during early drug discovery and chemical safety assessment. These models have benefitted from the large amount of data available in bioactivity databases. However, an issue that is often overlooked when using this data is the broad diversity in the biological assays present. The effect of small molecules on a protein can be measured in various ways, and this can influence the outcome. Yet, currently there is a lack of standardized, specific assay metadata, while this could help increase understanding of the origin of data points, improve data curation, and lead to better models that are both more accurate and make predictions specific to the readout of interest. To make use of the existing information on the biological context, we set out to create and validate multiple assay descriptors and test their use in protein-ligand interaction models. Dimensionality reduction of embedded free text assay descriptions from ChEMBL showed that text embeddings capture relevant features. Additionally, clustering of these embedded descriptions groups the assays in a way that enriches purity, matches manually categorized assays, and yields sensible topic describing words. From ligand-protein combinations with multiple measurements, it becomes apparent that the deviation between different measurements in general is higher than the deviation of measurements within assay categories, with a logarithmic mean absolute deviation of 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. Incorporating this biological context into the PCM models in the form of BioBERT-based embeddings improved the average <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> from 0.67 to 0.69 across different data sets and splits. Conversely, using simpler methods such as bag-of-words (in which frequently used words are used as features) no improvement was seen (average <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> 0.66). Overall, models that integrate assay embeddings yield more accurate predictions and give the user the option to train their model on all available data yet still predict specific end points. In addition, the novel method for assay categorization described here facilitates data curation and provides a useful overview of the biological context of studied targets. In conclusion, biological assay context is important for bioactivity modeling and provides a means to easily get insight into this context.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 65(13)
Leiden University (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.