Managing Smoke Risk from Wildland Fires: Northern California as a Case Study

Smoke fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) from increasing wildfires in the western United States threatens public health. While land managers often prioritize reducing wildfire risk in the wildland-urban interface, the impact on regional air quality from mitigating wildfire spread has been less explored. We developed a framework to quantify wildfire contributions to smoke exposure and assess targeted land management strategies. This data-driven approach integrates fire emissions and smoke transport to generate a smoke risk index at 0.25° × 0.25° resolution. We deploy the smoke risk index in an online tool, enabling stakeholders to analyze smoke risk under various scenarios of burned area, fuel consumption, and land management. Using Northern California as a case study, we estimate that in 2020, targeted land management in the 15 highest risk areas (∼3.5% of the total) could have reduced smoke exposure by 17.6%. However, most prescribed burns conducted from 2017 to 2020 did not overlap with these high-risk zones. Our framework also estimates excess deaths from smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, attributing ∼36,400 (95% CI: 25,400-47,200) deaths nationally to western US fires in the year following the 2020 fire season. Our adaptable tool can incorporate higher-resolution data sets and help stakeholders prioritize fuel treatment and fire suppression to mitigate smoke exposure risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01914
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Smoke Risk from Wildland Fires: Northern California as a Case Study

K. C. Chung, K.G. Vohra, Makoto Kelp, Dana Skelly et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Managing Smoke Risk from Wildland Fires: Northern California as a Case Study

K. C. Chung, K.G. Vohra, Makoto Kelp, Dana Skelly, Loretta J. Mickley, Tianjia Liu, Joel Schwartz, Matthew Carroll
article en

Abstract

Smoke fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) from increasing wildfires in the western United States threatens public health. While land managers often prioritize reducing wildfire risk in the wildland-urban interface, the impact on regional air quality from mitigating wildfire spread has been less explored. We developed a framework to quantify wildfire contributions to smoke exposure and assess targeted land management strategies. This data-driven approach integrates fire emissions and smoke transport to generate a smoke risk index at 0.25° × 0.25° resolution. We deploy the smoke risk index in an online tool, enabling stakeholders to analyze smoke risk under various scenarios of burned area, fuel consumption, and land management. Using Northern California as a case study, we estimate that in 2020, targeted land management in the 15 highest risk areas (∼3.5% of the total) could have reduced smoke exposure by 17.6%. However, most prescribed burns conducted from 2017 to 2020 did not overlap with these high-risk zones. Our framework also estimates excess deaths from smoke PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, attributing ∼36,400 (95% CI: 25,400-47,200) deaths nationally to western US fires in the year following the 2020 fire season. Our adaptable tool can incorporate higher-resolution data sets and help stakeholders prioritize fuel treatment and fire suppression to mitigate smoke exposure risks.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(27)
US Forest Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Harvard University Press (US), University of Birmingham (GB), Stanford University (US)
Climate Program Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.