Public entity liability beyond the veil of the inhouse company: insights and suggestions in light of ECHR case law on governmental organisations

The essay aims to analyze the orientation of the European Court of Human Rights, which, in order to protect property (Art. 1 First Additional Protocol ECHR) and the right to a fair trial (Art. 6 ECHR), recognizes, under certain conditions, a liability of the State for the acts, omissions and debts of companies that lack of institutional and operational independence from it. In order to ensure full and effective protection of the company’s creditors, the rules governing the liability of the public authority (including that pursuant to art. 19, paragraph 6, d.l. 78/2009, which exempts the State from liability for “direzione e coordinamento”) should be interpreted in a manner consistent with these principles, which have a specific relevance in the system of the hierarchy of sources of law in our legal system. In the author’s view, this orientation would have significant and specific consequences for in-house companies, as it could deter the public entity from committing abuses against them, in line with their for profit nature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17473/2282-667x-2025-1-3
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public entity liability beyond the veil of the inhouse company: insights and suggestions in light of ECHR case law on governmental organisations

Elisabetta Codazzi
Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Public entity liability beyond the veil of the inhouse company: insights and suggestions in light of ECHR case law on governmental organisations

Elisabetta Codazzi
article en

Abstract

The essay aims to analyze the orientation of the European Court of Human Rights, which, in order to protect property (Art. 1 First Additional Protocol ECHR) and the right to a fair trial (Art. 6 ECHR), recognizes, under certain conditions, a liability of the State for the acts, omissions and debts of companies that lack of institutional and operational independence from it. In order to ensure full and effective protection of the company’s creditors, the rules governing the liability of the public authority (including that pursuant to art. 19, paragraph 6, d.l. 78/2009, which exempts the State from liability for “direzione e coordinamento”) should be interpreted in a manner consistent with these principles, which have a specific relevance in the system of the hierarchy of sources of law in our legal system. In the author’s view, this orientation would have significant and specific consequences for in-house companies, as it could deter the public entity from committing abuses against them, in line with their for profit nature.

Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale(1-2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public entity liability beyond the veil of the inhouse company: insights and suggestions in light of ECHR case law on governmental organisations — Elisabetta Codazzi · Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS