Effects of Natural Fractures on Coal Drilling Response: Implications for CBM Fracturing Optimization

The efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) extraction is closely related to the drilling response of coal seams, which is significantly influenced by natural fracture development of coal seams. This work investigated 11 coal samples from the Baode, Xinyuan, and Huolinhe mines, employing quantitative fracture characterization, acoustic wave testing, drilling experiments, and cuttings analysis to systematically reveal the relationships and mechanisms between fracture parameters and coal drilling response characteristics. The result found that acoustic parameters (average wave velocity v and drilling surface wave velocity v0) exhibit significant negative correlations with fracture line density (ρ1) and area ratio (ρ2) (|r| > 0.7), while the geological strength index (GSI) positively correlates with acoustic parameters, confirming their utility as indirect indicators of fracture development. Fracture area ratio (ρ2) strongly correlates with drilling cuttings rate q (r = 0.82), whereas GSI negatively correlates with drilling rate w, indicating that highly fractured coal is more friable but structural stability constrains drilling efficiency, while fracture parameters show limited influence on drill cuttings quantity Q. Cuttings characteristics vary with fracture types and density. Type I coal (low-density coexisting exogenous fractures and cleats) produces cuttings dominated by fine particles with concentrated size distribution (average particle size d ≈ 0.52 mm, crushability index n = 0.46–0.61). Type II coal (exogenous-fracture-dominant) exhibits coarser particle sizes in cuttings (d ≈ 0.8 mm, n = 0.43–0.53). Type III coal (dense-cleat-dominant) drill cuttings are mainly coarse particles and are concentrated in distribution (d ≈ 1.53 mm, n = 0.72–0.98). Additionally, drilling response differences are governed by the coupling effects of vitrinite reflectance (Ro), density, and firmness coefficient (f), with Huolinhe coal being easier to drill due to its lower Ro, f, and density. This study elucidates the mechanism by which fracture development affects coal drilling response through multi-parameter correlation analysis, while also providing novel insights into the optimization of fracturing sweet spot selection for CBM development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18133404
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Natural Fractures on Coal Drilling Response: Implications for CBM Fracturing Optimization

Yuhang Xiao, Quanming Chen, Shuaifeng Lyu, Zhidong Han et al.
Energies
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Effects of Natural Fractures on Coal Drilling Response: Implications for CBM Fracturing Optimization

Yuhang Xiao, Quanming Chen, Shuaifeng Lyu, Zhidong Han, Haijun Zhang, Ao Lu
article en

Abstract

The efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) extraction is closely related to the drilling response of coal seams, which is significantly influenced by natural fracture development of coal seams. This work investigated 11 coal samples from the Baode, Xinyuan, and Huolinhe mines, employing quantitative fracture characterization, acoustic wave testing, drilling experiments, and cuttings analysis to systematically reveal the relationships and mechanisms between fracture parameters and coal drilling response characteristics. The result found that acoustic parameters (average wave velocity v and drilling surface wave velocity v0) exhibit significant negative correlations with fracture line density (ρ1) and area ratio (ρ2) (|r| > 0.7), while the geological strength index (GSI) positively correlates with acoustic parameters, confirming their utility as indirect indicators of fracture development. Fracture area ratio (ρ2) strongly correlates with drilling cuttings rate q (r = 0.82), whereas GSI negatively correlates with drilling rate w, indicating that highly fractured coal is more friable but structural stability constrains drilling efficiency, while fracture parameters show limited influence on drill cuttings quantity Q. Cuttings characteristics vary with fracture types and density. Type I coal (low-density coexisting exogenous fractures and cleats) produces cuttings dominated by fine particles with concentrated size distribution (average particle size d ≈ 0.52 mm, crushability index n = 0.46–0.61). Type II coal (exogenous-fracture-dominant) exhibits coarser particle sizes in cuttings (d ≈ 0.8 mm, n = 0.43–0.53). Type III coal (dense-cleat-dominant) drill cuttings are mainly coarse particles and are concentrated in distribution (d ≈ 1.53 mm, n = 0.72–0.98). Additionally, drilling response differences are governed by the coupling effects of vitrinite reflectance (Ro), density, and firmness coefficient (f), with Huolinhe coal being easier to drill due to its lower Ro, f, and density. This study elucidates the mechanism by which fracture development affects coal drilling response through multi-parameter correlation analysis, while also providing novel insights into the optimization of fracturing sweet spot selection for CBM development.

EnergiesVol. 18(13)
China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.