Lithofacies Types and Pore Structure Characteristics of Marine Shale in the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation, Middle Yangtze Region, China

The lithofacies and pore structural characteristics of shale reservoirs directly affect the exploration and development of shale gas. To clarify the exploration and development potential of the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation (SJT) shale in the Middle Yangtze region, China, this study employs integrated experimental approaches, including optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, X-ray diffraction (XRD) mineralogical analysis, and low-pressure gas (N2/CO2) adsorption, to classify mudstone lithofacies within the SJT and elucidate pore structural characteristics and dominant geological control across different lithofacies. The research results show that (1) Six main types of shale lithofacies are found in the STJ, including low-TOC massive calcareous mudstone (LMCM), low-TOC laminated mixed mudstone (LLMM), medium-TOC massive mixed mudstone (MMMM), high-TOC massive mixed mudstone (HMMM), high-TOC laminated siliceous mudstone (HLSM), and laminated argillaceous mudstone (LAM). (2) The pore types of SJT mudstone primarily include organic pores, intragranular clay mineral pores, and microfractures. The pore structure of mudstone is mainly controlled by clay mineral content and TOC content. However, the controlling factors of pore structure vary among different mudstone lithofacies. LMCM and LLMM are dominated by intragranular clay mineral pores, with their pore structures mainly controlled by clay mineral content. The pore types of HLMM and HLSM are organic pores, with pore structures predominantly controlled by TOC content. (3) The SJT mudstone gas reservoir exhibits diverse types, including HLSM, LAM, and LLMM. HLSM is characterized by the highest brittleness index and elevated pore volume (PV) and it can be considered the optimum lithofacies in the study area. Additionally, LLMM has the highest PV and relatively high brittleness index, positioning it as another significant reservoir target in the study area. Therefore, the Lower Cambrian shale gas reservoirs in the Middle Yangtze region exhibit diverse reservoir types. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the next phase of shale gas exploration planning in the Lower Cambrian.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lithofacies Types and Pore Structure Characteristics of Marine Shale in the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation, Middle Yangtze Region, China

Yujing Qian, Ping Gao, Qin Zhou, Wei Liu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
article

Lithofacies Types and Pore Structure Characteristics of Marine Shale in the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation, Middle Yangtze Region, China

Yujing Qian, Ping Gao, Qin Zhou, Wei Liu, Jialin Fan, Jinku Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The lithofacies and pore structural characteristics of shale reservoirs directly affect the exploration and development of shale gas. To clarify the exploration and development potential of the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation (SJT) shale in the Middle Yangtze region, China, this study employs integrated experimental approaches, including optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, X-ray diffraction (XRD) mineralogical analysis, and low-pressure gas (N2/CO2) adsorption, to classify mudstone lithofacies within the SJT and elucidate pore structural characteristics and dominant geological control across different lithofacies. The research results show that (1) Six main types of shale lithofacies are found in the STJ, including low-TOC massive calcareous mudstone (LMCM), low-TOC laminated mixed mudstone (LLMM), medium-TOC massive mixed mudstone (MMMM), high-TOC massive mixed mudstone (HMMM), high-TOC laminated siliceous mudstone (HLSM), and laminated argillaceous mudstone (LAM). (2) The pore types of SJT mudstone primarily include organic pores, intragranular clay mineral pores, and microfractures. The pore structure of mudstone is mainly controlled by clay mineral content and TOC content. However, the controlling factors of pore structure vary among different mudstone lithofacies. LMCM and LLMM are dominated by intragranular clay mineral pores, with their pore structures mainly controlled by clay mineral content. The pore types of HLMM and HLSM are organic pores, with pore structures predominantly controlled by TOC content. (3) The SJT mudstone gas reservoir exhibits diverse types, including HLSM, LAM, and LLMM. HLSM is characterized by the highest brittleness index and elevated pore volume (PV) and it can be considered the optimum lithofacies in the study area. Additionally, LLMM has the highest PV and relatively high brittleness index, positioning it as another significant reservoir target in the study area. Therefore, the Lower Cambrian shale gas reservoirs in the Middle Yangtze region exhibit diverse reservoir types. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the next phase of shale gas exploration planning in the Lower Cambrian.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(7)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.