Wildlife management and conservation in South Africa: informing legislative reform through expert consultation using the Policy Delphi methodology

South Africa's wildlife sustainable management requires cohesive, evidence-based policy development that balances conservation goals with socio-economic needs. This study employed the Policy Delphi methodology, based on subsequent questionnaire rounds, to gather expert insights on critical priorities for wildlife-related policy, focusing on four species: lions (<i>Panthera leo</i>), elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), rhinos (<i>Diceros bicornis</i> and <i>Ceratotherium simum</i>), and leopards (<i>Panthera pardus pardus</i>). Experts were divided into panels based on species and areas of expertise: hunting, management, translocation, research, and animal welfare. Through three rounds, which took place from March to July 2024, the study sought to pinpoint South African policy issues needing amendment, addition, or removal, gathering expert opinions to achieve 70% consensus and suggestions for integrating these into policies. A total of 60 experts accepted to participate, 14 compiled all three Delphi questionnaires, while 40 of them contributed to at least one round. In Round 1, 34 experts suggested 523 pertinent issues meeting the study criteria: 260 amendments, 233 additions, and 30 removals. In Round 2, 28 participants considered 363 issues relevant, of which 254 obtained final agreement in Round 3 by 19 experts, divided into 19 thematic categories. Moreover, in Round 3, 617 suggestions for integration into policies were collected. Overall, the analysis underscores that the experts preferred modifying existing policies rather than removing measures, emphasizing the adequacy of the policies with adjustments. The final list of issues confirmed at the end of Round 3 and their categories represent experts' priorities for the four focus species management reforms in South Africa. Moreover, the insights highlight gaps in South African wildlife legislation, including improved definitions, consideration of local communities, and addressing data deficiencies for evidence-based management and conservation. By identifying key areas for legislative improvement, this study provides a framework for actionable strategies to enhance wildlife policy in South Africa, following the broader aim of protecting wildlife, and with the potential of having an impact beyond national boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1549222
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildlife management and conservation in South Africa: informing legislative reform through expert consultation using the Policy Delphi methodology

Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Giulia Mascarello, Barbara de Mori, Elena Mercugliano et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Delphi Technique in Research
4.20
article

Wildlife management and conservation in South Africa: informing legislative reform through expert consultation using the Policy Delphi methodology

Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Giulia Mascarello, Barbara de Mori, Elena Mercugliano, Riccardo Da Re, Adriana Federica Cerizza, Magdel Boshoff, Arianna Dissegna, Luca Laner, Avery E Indovina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

South Africa's wildlife sustainable management requires cohesive, evidence-based policy development that balances conservation goals with socio-economic needs. This study employed the Policy Delphi methodology, based on subsequent questionnaire rounds, to gather expert insights on critical priorities for wildlife-related policy, focusing on four species: lions (<i>Panthera leo</i>), elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), rhinos (<i>Diceros bicornis</i> and <i>Ceratotherium simum</i>), and leopards (<i>Panthera pardus pardus</i>). Experts were divided into panels based on species and areas of expertise: hunting, management, translocation, research, and animal welfare. Through three rounds, which took place from March to July 2024, the study sought to pinpoint South African policy issues needing amendment, addition, or removal, gathering expert opinions to achieve 70% consensus and suggestions for integrating these into policies. A total of 60 experts accepted to participate, 14 compiled all three Delphi questionnaires, while 40 of them contributed to at least one round. In Round 1, 34 experts suggested 523 pertinent issues meeting the study criteria: 260 amendments, 233 additions, and 30 removals. In Round 2, 28 participants considered 363 issues relevant, of which 254 obtained final agreement in Round 3 by 19 experts, divided into 19 thematic categories. Moreover, in Round 3, 617 suggestions for integration into policies were collected. Overall, the analysis underscores that the experts preferred modifying existing policies rather than removing measures, emphasizing the adequacy of the policies with adjustments. The final list of issues confirmed at the end of Round 3 and their categories represent experts' priorities for the four focus species management reforms in South Africa. Moreover, the insights highlight gaps in South African wildlife legislation, including improved definitions, consideration of local communities, and addressing data deficiencies for evidence-based management and conservation. By identifying key areas for legislative improvement, this study provides a framework for actionable strategies to enhance wildlife policy in South Africa, following the broader aim of protecting wildlife, and with the potential of having an impact beyond national boundaries.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IT), Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Delphi Technique in Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.