Comparison of Heavy Metal Pollution, Health Risk, and Sources Between Surface and Deep Layers for an Agricultural Region Within the Pearl River Delta: Implications for Soil Environmental Research

During the past decades, agricultural soil heavy metal pollution has been becoming increasingly severe due to urbanization and industrialization. However, the impact of externally input heavy metals on deep soils remains unclear because most previous relevant research only focused on surface soils. In the present study, Concentrations of eight heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cr, Cd, As, and Hg) were determined for 72 pairs of surface and deep soil samples collected from an agricultural region close to the Pearl River estuary. Subsequently, heavy metal pollution and potential health risks were assessed using the Geo-accumulation Index and Potential Ecological Risk Index, a dose response model and Monte Carlo simulation, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model were combined to analyze heavy metal sources. The results indicated that average concentrations of all heavy metals exceeded their corresponding background values. Cd was identified as the main pollutant due to its extremely high values of <i>I<sub>geo</sub></i> and <i>Er</i>. Unacceptable potential heavy metal non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks indicated by respectively calculated HI and TCR, higher than thresholds 1.0 and 1.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, mainly arose from heavy metals As, Cd, Cr, and Ni through food ingestion and dermal absorption. Anthropogenic sources respectively contributed 19.7% and 38.9% for soil As and accounted for the main contributions to Cd, Cu, and Hg (Surface: 90.2%, 65.4%, 67.3%; Deep: 53.8%, 54.6%, 56.2%) within surface and deep layers. These results indicate that soil heavy metal contents with deep layers were also significantly influenced by anthropogenic input. Therefore, we suggest that both surface and deep soils should be investigated simultaneously to gain relatively accurate results for soil heavy metal pollution and source apportionments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxics
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070548
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Heavy Metal Pollution, Health Risk, and Sources Between Surface and Deep Layers for an Agricultural Region Within the Pearl River Delta: Implications for Soil Environmental Research

Mingkun Li, Tingping Ouyang, Zhao Wang, Zhaoyu Zhu et al.
Toxics
Heavy metals in environment
article

Comparison of Heavy Metal Pollution, Health Risk, and Sources Between Surface and Deep Layers for an Agricultural Region Within the Pearl River Delta: Implications for Soil Environmental Research

Mingkun Li, Tingping Ouyang, Zhao Wang, Zhaoyu Zhu, Zhenwei Bi, Yu Guo
article en

Abstract

During the past decades, agricultural soil heavy metal pollution has been becoming increasingly severe due to urbanization and industrialization. However, the impact of externally input heavy metals on deep soils remains unclear because most previous relevant research only focused on surface soils. In the present study, Concentrations of eight heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cr, Cd, As, and Hg) were determined for 72 pairs of surface and deep soil samples collected from an agricultural region close to the Pearl River estuary. Subsequently, heavy metal pollution and potential health risks were assessed using the Geo-accumulation Index and Potential Ecological Risk Index, a dose response model and Monte Carlo simulation, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model were combined to analyze heavy metal sources. The results indicated that average concentrations of all heavy metals exceeded their corresponding background values. Cd was identified as the main pollutant due to its extremely high values of <i>I<sub>geo</sub></i> and <i>Er</i>. Unacceptable potential heavy metal non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks indicated by respectively calculated HI and TCR, higher than thresholds 1.0 and 1.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, mainly arose from heavy metals As, Cd, Cr, and Ni through food ingestion and dermal absorption. Anthropogenic sources respectively contributed 19.7% and 38.9% for soil As and accounted for the main contributions to Cd, Cu, and Hg (Surface: 90.2%, 65.4%, 67.3%; Deep: 53.8%, 54.6%, 56.2%) within surface and deep layers. These results indicate that soil heavy metal contents with deep layers were also significantly influenced by anthropogenic input. Therefore, we suggest that both surface and deep soils should be investigated simultaneously to gain relatively accurate results for soil heavy metal pollution and source apportionments.

ToxicsVol. 13(7)
South China Normal University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry (CN), Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Heavy metals in environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.