Helpful assistant or fruitful facilitator? Investigating how personas affect language model behavior

One way to steer generations from large language models (LLM) is to assign a persona: a role that describes how the user expects the LLM to behave (e.g., a helpful assistant, a teacher, a woman). This paper investigates how personas affect diverse aspects of model behavior. We assign to seven LLMs 162 personas from 12 categories spanning variables like gender, sexual orientation, and occupation. We prompt them to answer questions from five datasets covering objective (e.g., questions about math and history) and subjective tasks (e.g., questions about beliefs and values). We also compare persona's generations to two baseline settings: a control persona setting with 30 paraphrases of "a helpful assistant" to control for models' prompt sensitivity, and an empty persona setting where no persona is assigned. We find that for all models and datasets, personas show greater variability than the control setting and that some measures of persona behavior generalize across models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325664
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Helpful assistant or fruitful facilitator? Investigating how personas affect language model behavior

Benjamin Roth, Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Topic Modeling
7.44
article

Helpful assistant or fruitful facilitator? Investigating how personas affect language model behavior

Benjamin Roth, Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

One way to steer generations from large language models (LLM) is to assign a persona: a role that describes how the user expects the LLM to behave (e.g., a helpful assistant, a teacher, a woman). This paper investigates how personas affect diverse aspects of model behavior. We assign to seven LLMs 162 personas from 12 categories spanning variables like gender, sexual orientation, and occupation. We prompt them to answer questions from five datasets covering objective (e.g., questions about math and history) and subjective tasks (e.g., questions about beliefs and values). We also compare persona's generations to two baseline settings: a control persona setting with 30 paraphrases of "a helpful assistant" to control for models' prompt sensitivity, and an empty persona setting where no persona is assigned. We find that for all models and datasets, personas show greater variability than the control setting and that some measures of persona behavior generalize across models.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
University of Vienna (AT), Diplomatic Academy of Vienna (AT)
Vienna Science and Technology Fund
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Topic Modeling
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Helpful assistant or fruitful facilitator? Investigating how personas affect language model behavior — Benjamin Roth, Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS