Pore Structure and Multifractal Characteristics of the Upper Lianggaoshan Formation in the Northeastern Sichuan Basin, China

The Upper Lianggaoshan (LGS) Formation in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, composed of shale with interbedded siltstone, is a promising target layer for shale oil. Accurate evaluation of pore structures is essential for effective exploration of shale oil. This study investigated pore structures of siltstone and shale samples from the Upper LGS Formation using low-pressure CO2 adsorption (LTCA), low-temperature N2 adsorption (LTNA), high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods. The single-exponent and multifractal dimensions of samples were determined, and the relationships between fractal dimensions and pore structures were explored. Results show that the pore size distribution (PSD) of siltstone and shale samples exhibits multi-peak characteristics, with mesopores (2–50 nm) being dominant in the total pore volumes. The multi-scaled pores in shale and siltstone samples exhibit fractal characteristics. The average values of single-fractal dimensions (D1, D2) obtained by LTNA data are 2.39 and 2.62 for shale samples, and 2.24 and 2.59 for siltstone samples, respectively. Compared to siltstones, the pore structures of shale samples exhibit greater complexity, indicated by larger fractal dimensions. The samples from subsections Liang 2 and Liang 3 exhibit greater heterogeneity compared to subsection Liang 1. The single-fractal dimensions of micropores and mesopores show positive correlations with specific surface area (SSA) and pore volume (PV), while the fractal dimension of macropores shows a negative correlation with average pore diameter and median radius. The average values of single-fractal dimension D3 obtained from HPMI data are 2.9644 and 2.9471 for shale and siltstone samples, respectively, indicating more complex structures of macropores in shale samples compared to siltstone samples. The average value of ΔDNMR and singularity strength range Δα obtained by a multifractal model for core samples from subsection Liang 1 are 1.868 and 2.155, respectively, which are the smallest among all of the three subsections, indicating that the heterogeneity of pore structures of subsection Liang 1 is the weakest. This research provides valuable guidance for shale oil development in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fractal and Fractional
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9070430
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pore Structure and Multifractal Characteristics of the Upper Lianggaoshan Formation in the Northeastern Sichuan Basin, China

Gaoxing Luo, Haitao Wang, Jingjing Guo, Liehui Zhang
2 citations
Fractal and Fractional
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
article

Pore Structure and Multifractal Characteristics of the Upper Lianggaoshan Formation in the Northeastern Sichuan Basin, China

Gaoxing Luo, Haitao Wang, Jingjing Guo, Liehui Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Upper Lianggaoshan (LGS) Formation in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, composed of shale with interbedded siltstone, is a promising target layer for shale oil. Accurate evaluation of pore structures is essential for effective exploration of shale oil. This study investigated pore structures of siltstone and shale samples from the Upper LGS Formation using low-pressure CO2 adsorption (LTCA), low-temperature N2 adsorption (LTNA), high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods. The single-exponent and multifractal dimensions of samples were determined, and the relationships between fractal dimensions and pore structures were explored. Results show that the pore size distribution (PSD) of siltstone and shale samples exhibits multi-peak characteristics, with mesopores (2–50 nm) being dominant in the total pore volumes. The multi-scaled pores in shale and siltstone samples exhibit fractal characteristics. The average values of single-fractal dimensions (D1, D2) obtained by LTNA data are 2.39 and 2.62 for shale samples, and 2.24 and 2.59 for siltstone samples, respectively. Compared to siltstones, the pore structures of shale samples exhibit greater complexity, indicated by larger fractal dimensions. The samples from subsections Liang 2 and Liang 3 exhibit greater heterogeneity compared to subsection Liang 1. The single-fractal dimensions of micropores and mesopores show positive correlations with specific surface area (SSA) and pore volume (PV), while the fractal dimension of macropores shows a negative correlation with average pore diameter and median radius. The average values of single-fractal dimension D3 obtained from HPMI data are 2.9644 and 2.9471 for shale and siltstone samples, respectively, indicating more complex structures of macropores in shale samples compared to siltstone samples. The average value of ΔDNMR and singularity strength range Δα obtained by a multifractal model for core samples from subsection Liang 1 are 1.868 and 2.155, respectively, which are the smallest among all of the three subsections, indicating that the heterogeneity of pore structures of subsection Liang 1 is the weakest. This research provides valuable guidance for shale oil development in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, China.

Fractal and FractionalVol. 9(7)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.