INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION POLICY AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (part 2)

The article continues the study of the international information policyof Ukraine as an object of state administration.The problem of increasing the effectiveness of the international information policyof Ukraine is especially relevant in the context of large-scale Russian aggression, duringwhich the enemy uses a wide range of means of special information and informationpsychological operations against Ukraine. Therefore, Ukraine needs to form a newtheoretical basis and a practical system of state-administrative means to promote its ownnational interests in the world information arena. The priority task in this direction is thedevelopment and scientific substantiation of the theoretical and methodologicalprinciples of the formation and implementation of the international information policy ofUkraine in the context of digital transformation.One of the components in the study of international information policy is thecategory of «diplomacy», diplomatic service. In scientific circulation we find variousnames and definitions of diplomacy: this is digital diplomacy, and, electronic diplomacy,and, diplomatic service, etc. All these concepts are undoubtedly related to publicadministration in the field of international information policy of Ukraine, determine thestrategic course, as well as political and state tasks in the information-analytical,organizational and managerial spheres.In the 21st century, with the development of information and communicationtechnologies, the era of digital technologies is coming, the role of social networks isincreasing, which today are an alternative to traditional means of communication forreceiving, distributing and exchanging information. In the modern realities of the globaldevelopment of the information society, the theoretical and methodological foundations(categories, patterns, principles, methods, concepts, models, systems) of the formationand implementation of Ukraineʼs international information policy in the context of digitaltransformations are clearly becoming the subject of scientific research, the result ofwhich are numerous works by many foreign and domestic scientists. This problemremains relevant for further research, in particular because the digital transformation ofthe state is an integral part of the more general process of the digital transformation ofsociety as a whole, which is determined by an innumerable number of objective andsubjective determinants. REFERENCES1. Aron, R. (2000). Myr i viina mizh natsiiamy. Kyiv: Univers, 688 p. [in Ukrainian].2. Honcharova, A. O. (2011). Dyplomatychna sluzhba yak skladova chastynaderzhavnoiʼ sluzhby Ukrainy. Aktualʼni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1, 420-424. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apdy_2011_1_51 [in Ukrainian].3. Hutsal, S. A. (2010). Publʼichna dyplomatiia yak suchasnyi prorytet zovnishnoiʼpolityky derzhavy. Stratehichni prorytety, 4, 106–113 [in Ukrainian].4. Derzhavne upravlinnia: navch. posibn. (2013). Tom 2. Kyiv; Dnipropetrovsk: NADU,324 p. [in Ukrainian].5. Durman, O. L., & Durman, M. O. (2022). Mizhdyzyscyplinarnyi pidkhid do analizyzovnishnoiʼ polityky i mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn. Dniprovskyi naukovyi chasopyspublʼichnoho upravlinnia, psykholohii, prava, 1, 14 [in Ukrainian].6. Encyklopediia derzhavnoho upravlinnia: u 8 t. (2011). K. V. Kovbasiuk et al. (Eds.).Kyiv: NADU, 1, Theory of State Administration, 748 p. [in Ukrainian].7. Kaluga, V. F. (2020). Mizhnarodna informatsiia u profesiynii diialʼnosti: navchalʼnyiposibnyk. Kyiv: NUBiP Ukrainy, 188 p. [in Ukrainian].8. Makarenko, Y. A., & Kuchmii, O. P. (2004). Publʼichna dyplomatiia. In Ukrainsʼkadyplomatychna entsyklopediia (Vol. 1). L. V. Hubersʼkyi et al. (Eds.). Kyiv: ZnanniaUkrainy [in Ukrainian].9. Morgenthau, H. J. (1982). In Defense of the National Interest. University Press ofAmerica, 306 p. [in English].10. Pazuk, A. V. (2015). Mizhnarodne informatsiine pravo: teoriia i praktyka:monohrafiia. Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko, Institute ofInternational Relations. Dnipropetrovsk: Serediak T. K., 447 p. [in Ukrainian].11. Pro natsionalʼnu bezpeku Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 21 chervnia 2018 roku№ 2469-VIII. (2018). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 31, 241 [in Ukrainian].12. Reznikov, V. V. (2020). Derzhavna polityka u sferi yevropeiskoiʼ intehratsii Ukrainy:teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. Kharkiv: Disa Plyus, 364 p. [in Ukrainian].13. Stratehichne partnerstvo v mizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh: monohrafiia. (2018).Ye. Makarenko, M. Ozhevan (Eds.). Kyiv: Vadeks, 542 p. [in Ukrainian].14. Subotin, A. (2011). Mizhnarodna polityka: politychna entsyklopediia. Yu. Levenets,Yu. Shapoval et al. (Eds.). Kyiv: Parlamentʼsʼke vydavnytstvo, 452 p. [in Ukrainian].15. Taran, Ye. (2020). Spivvidnoshennia ponʼiatʼ «derzhavne upravlinnia», «publʼichneadministruvannia» ta «publʼichne upravlinnia» u transformatsiinykh protsesakhUkrainy. Vcheni zapysky TNU im. V. I. Vernadsʼkoho. Seriia Derzhavne upravlinnia,31(70), 2, 33-37 [in Ukrainian].16. EuropeAid / Contract EVA/101-749. (2005). Handbook for Monitors: Resultsoriented Monitoring of External Assistance financed by the EC. p. 15 [in English].17. Tsivatyi, V. (2015). Yevropeiska systema mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn i dyplomatychnapraktyka v period Trydtsiatiletnoiʼ viiny (1618–1648 rr.): instytutsionalʼnyi takongruientnyi dyskursy. Naukovi pratsi Kamʼianetsʼ-Podilʼsʼkoho natsionalʼnohouniversytetu im. Ivana Ohienka. Istorichni nauky, 30, 39-48 [in Ukrainian].18. Shustenko, S. O. (2022). Informatsiina polityka Rady Yevropy u suchasnykhmizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh: funktsionalʼnyi ta instytutsionalʼnyi vymir (Doctoraldissertation, Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko, Mіnistry ofEducation and Science of Ukraine). Kyiv: 207 p. [in Ukrainian].