MODERN STATE: STRONG STATE OR CORPORATION STATE

The article is devoted to identifying key trends in the development of themodern state, its main characteristics and trends of further development.It is determined that modern geopolitical world trends necessarily lead to theneed to create a «strong state», because only a strong state is able to effectively solve theproblems of modern life. Only a strong state can resist the erosion of national-stateidentity, which is associated with modern processes of globalization. The main featuresof such a state should be: the effectiveness of economic transformations; effectiveadministration with a minimum of bureaucracy, control of corruption and bribery;maintaining a high level of transparency and accountability of government institutions;legitimacy and stability of the state, etc.At the same time, it has been determined that today the state has difficultypreserving its national identity, as transnational corporations are destroying theestablished state system; the sharp mobility of the population is increasing, socioeconomic contradictions between regions are intensifying, etc.The idea that in a globalizing world, there is free competition that stimulatesinnovation, reduces prices and benefits the consumer is nothing more than an illusion. Infact, food, medicine, information - everything that is used by every person every day iscontrolled by a few investment firms.The content of the concept of «stakeholder capitalism» is analyzed, which is thatif corporations no longer think exclusively about achieving profit, literally at any cost,then the perception of them in the public consciousness will change – corporations appearas a source of goodness, justice and competence, in contrast to the government, whichdoes not care about the population and constantly leads the situation into crisis.The article analyzes the activities of BigTech - the largest technology companiesthat create their own ecosystems: Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Alibaba, Meta (Facebook),etc., a huge resource that is expressed in money and talents. REFERENCES1. Bohutskyi, P. (n.d.). Sylna derzhava u systemi pravovoho zabezpechennianatsionalnoiʼ bezpeky. Retrieved from https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d4a25140-e78a-4244-a05c-dcfd443317e9/content [in Ukrainian].2. Voytovych, R. (n.d.). Osoblyvosti formuvannia «sylnoyi derzhavy v umovakhhlobalizatsii. Retrieved from https://ipiend.gov.ua/wpcontent/uploads/2018/07/voitovych_osoblyvosti.pdf [in Ukrainian].3. Holubovska, V. S. (2013). Informatsiine suspilʼstvo: mozhlyvosti, problemy taperspektyvy rozvytku. Informatsiia i pravo, 2(8), 101 [in Ukrainian].4. Derkach, V. L. (2019). Filosofiia maibutnioho. Holobni problemy suchasnosti:navch. posib. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].5. Dubovyk, N., & Puhach, V. (2010). Fenomen sylnoi derzhavy: teoretychniaspekty praktychnykh problem. Vysnyk NTUU «KPI». Politolohiia. Sotsiologiia.Pravo, 3(7), 12 [in Ukrainian].6. Kremenʼ, T. V. (2002). Nova rolʼ derzhavy yak holovnoho nosiia suverenitetu vumovakh hlobalizatsii. Derzhava i pravo: Zb. naukovykh prats / In-t derzhavy iprava im. Koretsʼkoho NAN Ukrainy, 21, 670-671 [in Ukrainian].7. Maffesoli, M. (2017). Pohliad, shcho narod – tse dytyna, iaku potribnovykhovuvaty, povnistiu sebe vycherpav. Ukrinform. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/2252920-misel-maffesoli-francuzkijsociolog.html [in Ukrainian].8. Mazzucato, M. (2019). Yak zapobihaty nastupu tsyfrovoho feodalizmu. ProjectSyndicate. Retrieved from https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/platform-economy-digital-feudalism-by-marianamazzucato-2019-10 [in English].9. Oborotov, Yu. (2010). Infliatsiia vlady ta prava yak indykatory slabkoiʼ derzhavy.Naukovi pratsi Natsionalʼnoho universytetu «Odesʼka iurydychna akademiia», 9,89-97. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nponyua_2010_9_11[in Ukrainian].10. Oborotov, Yu. (2014). Suchasna derzhava: vid obrazu do realii. Iurydychnyivisnyk, 6, 6-13 [in Ukrainian].11. Petrova, A. (2021, July 5). Shcho take BigTech i chym vin vidrizniaietsia vidFinTech. HighTech Plus. Retrieved from https://hightech.plus/2021/07/05/chtotakoe-bigtech-i-chem-on-otlichaetsya-ot-fintech [in Ukrainian].12. Steele, R. (1955). The Englishman. London, 114 [in English].13. Spence, M. A., Akerlof, G. A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Interview with the 2001Laureates in Economics. Nobel Prize. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economicsciences/laureates/2001/akerlof-spence-stiglitz-interview-transcript.html [inEnglish].14. Filimonova, H. (n.d.). Investytsiini hihanty SSHA Vanguard Group ta BlackRockna shliakhu vstanovlennia holovnoiʼ olihopolii. Panorama. Retrieved fromhttps://panor.ru/articles/investitsionnye-giganty-ssha-vanguard-group-iblackrock-na-puti-ustanovleniya-globalnoy-oligopolii/84454.html#[in Ukrainian].15. Fukuyama, F. (n.d.). Sylna derzhava. Upravlinnia ta svitovyi poriadok u XXIstolittti. Retrieved from https://magicbook.com.ua/uk/product-324464.html[in English].16. Habermas, Y. U. (2011). Postmetaphysical Thinking / Spirit and Letter (280 p.)[in English].17. Shulʼman, Ye. (n.d.). Maibutnie derzhavy i derzhava maibutnioho. Zbruch.Retrieved from https://Збруч.htm /node/48241 [in Ukrainian].