Common Practices of the EU Intellectual Property Network as Soft Law and Beyond

This paper examines the Common Practices of the European Union Intellectual Property Network as instruments of soft law. The reform of trade mark law in 2015 authorised the Intellectual Property Offices who belong the Network to converge their practices. This is done in cooperation with stakeholders from the private sector, who are the users of trade mark system. The Common Practices adopted so far harmonize trade mark procedures across European Union, with the aim to enhance transparency, legal certainty, and predictability for both examiners and users. The study discusses the legal significance of Common Practices as European Union soft law in general, contemplating their validity and legitimacy within the European legal framework and highlighting that their effectiveness stems from both internal recognition in European law and normative expectations. The European Court of Justice has recognised legal effects that soft law instruments may have, including self-binding effect and the obligation of Member State courts to take such instruments into consideration while deciding cases. While Common Practices are not legally binding, they exert influence by creating normative messages that guide the behaviour of trade mark offices and applicants. Keywords: Soft Law; Trademarks; Common Practices; EU Intellectual Property Network

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Athens Journal of Law
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.11-3-11
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Practices of the EU Intellectual Property Network as Soft Law and Beyond

Tanel Kalmet
Athens Journal of Law
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Common Practices of the EU Intellectual Property Network as Soft Law and Beyond

Tanel Kalmet
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the Common Practices of the European Union Intellectual Property Network as instruments of soft law. The reform of trade mark law in 2015 authorised the Intellectual Property Offices who belong the Network to converge their practices. This is done in cooperation with stakeholders from the private sector, who are the users of trade mark system. The Common Practices adopted so far harmonize trade mark procedures across European Union, with the aim to enhance transparency, legal certainty, and predictability for both examiners and users. The study discusses the legal significance of Common Practices as European Union soft law in general, contemplating their validity and legitimacy within the European legal framework and highlighting that their effectiveness stems from both internal recognition in European law and normative expectations. The European Court of Justice has recognised legal effects that soft law instruments may have, including self-binding effect and the obligation of Member State courts to take such instruments into consideration while deciding cases. While Common Practices are not legally binding, they exert influence by creating normative messages that guide the behaviour of trade mark offices and applicants. Keywords: Soft Law; Trademarks; Common Practices; EU Intellectual Property Network

Athens Journal of LawVol. 11(3)
Tallinn University (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.