Using Large Language Models in Behavioral Science Interventions: Promise & Risk

Many behavioral science-based interventions, such as nudges and so-called psychologically wise interventions, seek to improve people’s lives by using words to shift them toward helpful perspectives and behaviors. Large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s GPT models or Google’s Gemini have the potential to revolutionize these interventions by making them more personalized, scalable, and cost-effective. This article describes how three groups of people—designers of interventions, intermediaries who interact with the intended beneficiaries, and the intended beneficiaries themselves—might use LLMs and identifies potential benefits and risks of those uses for the intended beneficiaries of interventions. We hypothesize that the potential benefits and risks are lowest when designers interact with LLMs, higher when intermediaries interact, and highest when the intended beneficiaries interact directly. We provide suggestions for mitigating the risks so that policymakers can safely deliver on the promise of LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607251344698
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Large Language Models in Behavioral Science Interventions: Promise & Risk

Margarett Clapper, David S. Yeager, Desmond C. Ong, Christopher J. Bryan et al.
1 citations
Behavioral Science & Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Using Large Language Models in Behavioral Science Interventions: Promise & Risk

Margarett Clapper, David S. Yeager, Desmond C. Ong, Christopher J. Bryan, Cameron A. Hecht, Dorottya Demszky, Michaela Jones, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Diyi Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many behavioral science-based interventions, such as nudges and so-called psychologically wise interventions, seek to improve people’s lives by using words to shift them toward helpful perspectives and behaviors. Large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s GPT models or Google’s Gemini have the potential to revolutionize these interventions by making them more personalized, scalable, and cost-effective. This article describes how three groups of people—designers of interventions, intermediaries who interact with the intended beneficiaries, and the intended beneficiaries themselves—might use LLMs and identifies potential benefits and risks of those uses for the intended beneficiaries of interventions. We hypothesize that the potential benefits and risks are lowest when designers interact with LLMs, higher when intermediaries interact, and highest when the intended beneficiaries interact directly. We provide suggestions for mitigating the risks so that policymakers can safely deliver on the promise of LLMs.

Behavioral Science & PolicyVol. 11(1)
Palo Alto University (US), Saint Louis University (US), University of Rochester (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.