LITERATURE REVIEW ON AUTONOMOUS DRIVING DATASETS AND PARAMETER CALIBRATION FOR CAR FOLLOWING EVENTS

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are expected to reshape future transportation systems. It is crucial to have high-quality datasets for the development of reliable driving algorithms and making important decisions in the transportation sector. Additionally, real-world AV-oriented datasets are essential for understanding the impact of AVs on human-driven vehicles (HDVs), traffic flow, and for developing data-driven car-following models. Parameter setting in these models is essential to simulate real-world driving behavior, as AVs can either enhance or hinder transportation network performance depending on settings like time headway, acceleration, and penetration rates. This study reviewed driving behavioral models for AVs, assessed the availability and characteristics of different open access real-world AV datasets, and calibrated parameters for the Wiedemann 99 and Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) car-following models using the Lyft L5 AV dataset. Findings highlight that each dataset has specific applications, underscoring the importance of understanding their characteristics for appropriate usage. Calibration results indicated variability in parameters for various car-following events, necessitating calibration for varied leader-follower scenarios. The Wiedemann 99 model showed that AVs following HDVs maintain a smaller time headway (CC1) compared to HDVs following AVs, whereas the IDM showed the opposite. Also, AVs tend to maintain longer spacing and time gap (CC4 and CC5) while following HDVs, and take less time (CC3) to decelerate and maintain a safe distance, compared to HDV-following-AV cases, which also similar to IDM based results (s0). Notably, significant behavioral changes in human drivers occur when interacting with both AVs and other HDVs in mixed-traffic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of JSCE
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.24-20091
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LITERATURE REVIEW ON AUTONOMOUS DRIVING DATASETS AND PARAMETER CALIBRATION FOR CAR FOLLOWING EVENTS

Yasunori Muromachi, Sultana RAJIA
Journal of JSCE
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
article

LITERATURE REVIEW ON AUTONOMOUS DRIVING DATASETS AND PARAMETER CALIBRATION FOR CAR FOLLOWING EVENTS

Yasunori Muromachi, Sultana RAJIA
article en

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are expected to reshape future transportation systems. It is crucial to have high-quality datasets for the development of reliable driving algorithms and making important decisions in the transportation sector. Additionally, real-world AV-oriented datasets are essential for understanding the impact of AVs on human-driven vehicles (HDVs), traffic flow, and for developing data-driven car-following models. Parameter setting in these models is essential to simulate real-world driving behavior, as AVs can either enhance or hinder transportation network performance depending on settings like time headway, acceleration, and penetration rates. This study reviewed driving behavioral models for AVs, assessed the availability and characteristics of different open access real-world AV datasets, and calibrated parameters for the Wiedemann 99 and Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) car-following models using the Lyft L5 AV dataset. Findings highlight that each dataset has specific applications, underscoring the importance of understanding their characteristics for appropriate usage. Calibration results indicated variability in parameters for various car-following events, necessitating calibration for varied leader-follower scenarios. The Wiedemann 99 model showed that AVs following HDVs maintain a smaller time headway (CC1) compared to HDVs following AVs, whereas the IDM showed the opposite. Also, AVs tend to maintain longer spacing and time gap (CC4 and CC5) while following HDVs, and take less time (CC3) to decelerate and maintain a safe distance, compared to HDV-following-AV cases, which also similar to IDM based results (s0). Notably, significant behavioral changes in human drivers occur when interacting with both AVs and other HDVs in mixed-traffic conditions.

Journal of JSCEVol. 12(2)
Shanghai Institute for Science of Science (CN), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.