Miscalibrations in Self-evaluation: The Influence of Dunning–Kruger Effect Among Educators

The Dunning–Kruger (DK) effect is a cognitive bias in which individuals overestimate their abilities, leading to overconfidence and resistance to feedback. This study examines the DK effect among educators in higher education institutions in Saudi Arabia, focusing on the gap between educators’ self-assessments and student evaluations. The research found significant disparities between educators’ self-evaluations and student evaluations, indicating a pronounced DK effect. Educators rated their performance substantially higher than students, especially at the start and during the course. Differences between expatriate and Saudi educators were also notable with expatriate educators rating themselves more favourably than their local counterparts. Gender differences in self-assessment were minimal. The findings highlight the need for educational institutions to implement more comprehensive evaluation systems, incorporating peer reviews, student feedback and targeted self-assessment training. Such measures can help mitigate the DK effect, enabling educators to receive accurate feedback and engage in meaningful professional growth. The study’s results emphasize the importance of fostering a culture of continuous improvement and self-awareness among educators to enhance teaching effectiveness and improve student learning outcomes. Future research should explore the DK effect in diverse cultural and educational settings to validate these findings and expand our understanding of cognitive biases in professional development. Overall, this research underscores the critical role of addressing cognitive biases in performance evaluations and contributes valuable insights into the DK effect in the education sector.