A novel framework for the uncertainty evaluation of virtual flow meters

Abstract The focus on virtual experiments (VEs) utilized for flow measurement in industrial applications is increasingly growing in the context of Industry 4.0 and the European Green Deal. They enable the replacement of cost-intensive physical measurements with computational models. However, the reliability of these virtual flow measurements depends—just as for physical measurements—highly on robust uncertainty quantification. This study introduces a novel framework for uncertainty evaluation that integrates the law of propagation of uncertainty for linear systems and the propagation of distributions for nonlinear systems, following the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Within this framework, a virtual calibration approach is incorporated that allows the determination of the fluid mechanical calibration factor from VEs instead of cost-intensive measurements. A case study with different Reynolds numbers and geometric configurations demonstrates that the proposed uncertainty evaluation methods perform equally well for an ultrasonic flow meter benchmark application. The proposed approach offers the flexibility to include further error and uncertainty sources, like modeling errors or uncertainties due to missing information in the description of the measurement set-up. Hence, it underscores the potential of VEs in flow measurement towards the virtual calibration of flow meters in complex industrial settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/adea0e
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel framework for the uncertainty evaluation of virtual flow meters

Manuel Marschall, Nursen Bayazit, Sonja Schmelter, M. Straka
2 citations
Measurement Science and Technology
Water Systems and Optimization
1.91
article

A novel framework for the uncertainty evaluation of virtual flow meters

Manuel Marschall, Nursen Bayazit, Sonja Schmelter, M. Straka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The focus on virtual experiments (VEs) utilized for flow measurement in industrial applications is increasingly growing in the context of Industry 4.0 and the European Green Deal. They enable the replacement of cost-intensive physical measurements with computational models. However, the reliability of these virtual flow measurements depends—just as for physical measurements—highly on robust uncertainty quantification. This study introduces a novel framework for uncertainty evaluation that integrates the law of propagation of uncertainty for linear systems and the propagation of distributions for nonlinear systems, following the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Within this framework, a virtual calibration approach is incorporated that allows the determination of the fluid mechanical calibration factor from VEs instead of cost-intensive measurements. A case study with different Reynolds numbers and geometric configurations demonstrates that the proposed uncertainty evaluation methods perform equally well for an ultrasonic flow meter benchmark application. The proposed approach offers the flexibility to include further error and uncertainty sources, like modeling errors or uncertainties due to missing information in the description of the measurement set-up. Hence, it underscores the potential of VEs in flow measurement towards the virtual calibration of flow meters in complex industrial settings.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(7)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
European Partnership on Metrology
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Water Systems and Optimization
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.