User X’s Sentiment on Cryptocurrency: Comparison of SVM and LSTM Methods

This research analyzes the sentiment of X users towards cryptocurrency using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods. This research aimed to determine the effectiveness of these methods in classifying sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral. Data was collected from a dataset of crypto-related tweets. Preprocessing steps include tokenization, stop-word removal, and normalization. SVM and LSTM models were then trained and tested on this dataset. The results show that both methods are effective, with the LSTM model showing slightly better performance in handling sequential data compared to the SVM model. LSTM model has a higher training accuracy compared to SVM with a training accuracy percentage of 94.45% in the LSTM model compared to 88.66% in the SVM model. Testing accuracy of the LSTM model produces a percentage of 77.00% while the SVM model produces a percentage of 78.65%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Merpati (Menara Penelitian Akademika Teknologi Informasi)
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/jim.2025.v13.i01.p06
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User X’s Sentiment on Cryptocurrency: Comparison of SVM and LSTM Methods

Putu Veda Andreyana, I Gst Bgs Bayu Adi Pramana, Putu Widiadnyana, Dean Agnia et al.
Jurnal Ilmiah Merpati (Menara Penelitian Akademika Teknologi Informasi)
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

User X’s Sentiment on Cryptocurrency: Comparison of SVM and LSTM Methods

Putu Veda Andreyana, I Gst Bgs Bayu Adi Pramana, Putu Widiadnyana, Dean Agnia, Kadek Boy Brahmanda Satrya Montana, Krisna Juniartha
article en

Abstract

This research analyzes the sentiment of X users towards cryptocurrency using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods. This research aimed to determine the effectiveness of these methods in classifying sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral. Data was collected from a dataset of crypto-related tweets. Preprocessing steps include tokenization, stop-word removal, and normalization. SVM and LSTM models were then trained and tested on this dataset. The results show that both methods are effective, with the LSTM model showing slightly better performance in handling sequential data compared to the SVM model. LSTM model has a higher training accuracy compared to SVM with a training accuracy percentage of 94.45% in the LSTM model compared to 88.66% in the SVM model. Testing accuracy of the LSTM model produces a percentage of 77.00% while the SVM model produces a percentage of 78.65%.

Jurnal Ilmiah Merpati (Menara Penelitian Akademika Teknologi Informasi)Vol. 13(1)
Udayana University (ID), Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.