Trade‐Offs Among <scp>SDGs</scp> : How the Pursuit of Economic, Food, and Urban Development Goals May Undermine Climate and Equity Targets?

ABSTRACT The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive framework for addressing global challenges; however, their implementation reveals critical tensions between development priorities and climate action that warrant deeper examination. Indeed, one significant factor impacting the implementation of the SDGs is the presence of conflicts between certain goals. Accordingly, this study aims to critically examine how the pursuit of economic growth (SDG 8), food security (SDG 2), clean energy (SDG 7), and urban development (SDG 11) may exacerbate climate change and environmental degradation (SDGs 13–15) while also reinforcing social inequalities (SDGs 6, 10). Employing a review‐based approach to assess SDG interactions—focusing on the climate‐development nexus, particularly the relationship between economic expansion (SDG 8), environmental sustainability (SDGs 13–15), and social equity (SDGs 1, 5, and 10)—this research identifies key areas of conflict that challenge the framework's internal coherence. Findings indicate significant trade‐offs between economic growth and environmental sustainability, alongside previously underexamined tensions between social equity goals and resource‐intensive development strategies. Accordingly, the study proposes a roadmap for resolving these tensions through integrated climate governance, targeted interventions, and cross‐sectoral decision‐making that aligns development with the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda. The practical implications of the study are twofold. First, it triggers a reflection on the root causes of conflicting goals, a serious problem that has been largely overlooked. Second, it highlights the importance of addressing the need to pay more attention to existing conflicts, as they have adverse effects that should be avoided. By offering actionable recommendations, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainable development within the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. It provides a strategic pathway toward balancing economic development with environmental resilience, ensuring that SDG implementation aligns with the urgent need for climate action within the remaining timeframe before 2030.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70029
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade‐Offs Among SDGs : How the Pursuit of Economic, Food, and Urban Development Goals May Undermine Climate and Equity Targets?

Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Tarek Ben Hassen, Walter Leal Filho
5 citations
Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
12.11
article

Trade‐Offs Among SDGs : How the Pursuit of Economic, Food, and Urban Development Goals May Undermine Climate and Equity Targets?

Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Tarek Ben Hassen, Walter Leal Filho
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive framework for addressing global challenges; however, their implementation reveals critical tensions between development priorities and climate action that warrant deeper examination. Indeed, one significant factor impacting the implementation of the SDGs is the presence of conflicts between certain goals. Accordingly, this study aims to critically examine how the pursuit of economic growth (SDG 8), food security (SDG 2), clean energy (SDG 7), and urban development (SDG 11) may exacerbate climate change and environmental degradation (SDGs 13–15) while also reinforcing social inequalities (SDGs 6, 10). Employing a review‐based approach to assess SDG interactions—focusing on the climate‐development nexus, particularly the relationship between economic expansion (SDG 8), environmental sustainability (SDGs 13–15), and social equity (SDGs 1, 5, and 10)—this research identifies key areas of conflict that challenge the framework's internal coherence. Findings indicate significant trade‐offs between economic growth and environmental sustainability, alongside previously underexamined tensions between social equity goals and resource‐intensive development strategies. Accordingly, the study proposes a roadmap for resolving these tensions through integrated climate governance, targeted interventions, and cross‐sectoral decision‐making that aligns development with the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda. The practical implications of the study are twofold. First, it triggers a reflection on the root causes of conflicting goals, a serious problem that has been largely overlooked. Second, it highlights the importance of addressing the need to pay more attention to existing conflicts, as they have adverse effects that should be avoided. By offering actionable recommendations, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainable development within the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. It provides a strategic pathway toward balancing economic development with environmental resilience, ensuring that SDG implementation aligns with the urgent need for climate action within the remaining timeframe before 2030.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(S1)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Universität Hamburg (DE), Qatar University (QA), HAW Hamburg (DE), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.