Analysis of the Revocation of the Lawsuit for Unlawful Acts Before the Defendant's Answer to the Determination Study Number 203/Pdt. G/2022/Pn Plk at the Palangka Raya District Court

In the Indonesian civil law system, the plaintiff’s ability to withdraw a lawsuit before the defendant responds is a key procedural aspect regulated by Article 271 of the Reglement op de Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering (Rv). This analysis explores the application of this rule in Determination Number 203/PDT.G/2022/PN PLK at the Palangka Raya District Court, where the plaintiff, Porwanto, withdrew a lawsuit for unlawful acts against three defendants before their response. The court approved the withdrawal, ordered the plaintiff to pay court costs of Rp2,160,000, and removed the case from the register. This case reflects the balance between plaintiff autonomy and judicial efficiency, yet it raises concerns about potential procedural abuse. This study underscores the need for strict oversight to ensure such flexibility does not compromise fairness for all parties involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1896
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Revocation of the Lawsuit for Unlawful Acts Before the Defendant's Answer to the Determination Study Number 203/Pdt. G/2022/Pn Plk at the Palangka Raya District Court

Thea Farina, Andika Wijaya, Anggira Azani
Journal of Law Politic and Humanities
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Analysis of the Revocation of the Lawsuit for Unlawful Acts Before the Defendant's Answer to the Determination Study Number 203/Pdt. G/2022/Pn Plk at the Palangka Raya District Court

Thea Farina, Andika Wijaya, Anggira Azani
article en

Abstract

In the Indonesian civil law system, the plaintiff’s ability to withdraw a lawsuit before the defendant responds is a key procedural aspect regulated by Article 271 of the Reglement op de Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering (Rv). This analysis explores the application of this rule in Determination Number 203/PDT.G/2022/PN PLK at the Palangka Raya District Court, where the plaintiff, Porwanto, withdrew a lawsuit for unlawful acts against three defendants before their response. The court approved the withdrawal, ordered the plaintiff to pay court costs of Rp2,160,000, and removed the case from the register. This case reflects the balance between plaintiff autonomy and judicial efficiency, yet it raises concerns about potential procedural abuse. This study underscores the need for strict oversight to ensure such flexibility does not compromise fairness for all parties involved.

Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesVol. 5(5)
University of Palangka Raya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.