Unveiling the Survival Gap: Addressing the Challenges of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents

Background: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) remains the most common pediatric cancer, yet survival outcomes vary widely across age groups. In Indonesia, comprehensive data on ALL survival rates are sparse, particularly for adolescents who often fare worse than younger children. The underlying factors contributing to the difference in adolescent survival rates still need to be fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the survival rates of children and adolescents with ALL treated at Dharmais Cancer Hospital.Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 94 ALL patients, including 37 adolescent patients and 71 patients with B-lineage ALL. All patients with ALL from 2021 to 2023 were identified. Children aged 1–18 years, diagnosed with ALL based on bone marrow results and not yet treated, are included in the study. Patients were stratified by risk stratification (Standard Risk [SR] vs. High Risk [HR]), lineage (B-lineage vs. T-lineage), and age group (children under 10 vs. adolescents 10 years and above). The survival curve was analyzed using the KaplanMeier method, and the log-rank test was used to assess and compare survival across groups.Results: The overall survival (OS) rate for ALL patients was 49.5%. Adolescents had a significantly lower OS rate of 23.2% compared to children. SR patients exhibited an OS rate of 95.7%, while HR patients had a 33.3%. B-cell lineage had a higher OS rate (59.8%) than T-cell lineage (15.9%). In B-cell ALL, OS was 61.4% in children but only 28.1% in adolescents. Conclusion: The survival rate for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is significantly lower than that of children, influenced by risk stratification, lineage, and age. Further research is needed to identify these risk factors through genetic and molecular analyses.Conclusion: The survival rate for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is significantly lower than that of children, influenced by risk stratification, cell type, and age. Unexplained factors, including lineage differences, remain a challenge in adolescents. Further research into genetic and molecular factors is essential to enhance treatment precision and improve survival rates for ALL patients in Indonesia, especially adolescents.Keywords: Overall Survival, Leukemia, Adolescent ALL, Stratification

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.v19i2.1396
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the Survival Gap: Addressing the Challenges of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents

Kuntjoro Harimurti, Ahmad Rusdan Handoyo Utomo, Murti Andriastuti, Teny Tjitra Sari et al.
Indonesian Journal of Cancer
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Unveiling the Survival Gap: Addressing the Challenges of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents

Kuntjoro Harimurti, Ahmad Rusdan Handoyo Utomo, Murti Andriastuti, Teny Tjitra Sari, Fahreza Saputra, Mururul Aisyi, Hikari Ambara Sjakti, Fifi Dwijayanti, Agus Susanto Kosasih
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) remains the most common pediatric cancer, yet survival outcomes vary widely across age groups. In Indonesia, comprehensive data on ALL survival rates are sparse, particularly for adolescents who often fare worse than younger children. The underlying factors contributing to the difference in adolescent survival rates still need to be fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the survival rates of children and adolescents with ALL treated at Dharmais Cancer Hospital.Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 94 ALL patients, including 37 adolescent patients and 71 patients with B-lineage ALL. All patients with ALL from 2021 to 2023 were identified. Children aged 1–18 years, diagnosed with ALL based on bone marrow results and not yet treated, are included in the study. Patients were stratified by risk stratification (Standard Risk [SR] vs. High Risk [HR]), lineage (B-lineage vs. T-lineage), and age group (children under 10 vs. adolescents 10 years and above). The survival curve was analyzed using the KaplanMeier method, and the log-rank test was used to assess and compare survival across groups.Results: The overall survival (OS) rate for ALL patients was 49.5%. Adolescents had a significantly lower OS rate of 23.2% compared to children. SR patients exhibited an OS rate of 95.7%, while HR patients had a 33.3%. B-cell lineage had a higher OS rate (59.8%) than T-cell lineage (15.9%). In B-cell ALL, OS was 61.4% in children but only 28.1% in adolescents. Conclusion: The survival rate for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is significantly lower than that of children, influenced by risk stratification, lineage, and age. Further research is needed to identify these risk factors through genetic and molecular analyses.Conclusion: The survival rate for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is significantly lower than that of children, influenced by risk stratification, cell type, and age. Unexplained factors, including lineage differences, remain a challenge in adolescents. Further research into genetic and molecular factors is essential to enhance treatment precision and improve survival rates for ALL patients in Indonesia, especially adolescents.Keywords: Overall Survival, Leukemia, Adolescent ALL, Stratification

Indonesian Journal of CancerVol. 19(2)
Yarsi University (ID), University of Indonesia (ID), Dharmais Cancer Hospital (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.