Three Standpoints in Risk-Based Regulation: Applying a Meta-Regulatory Framework to Personal Data Protection

By distinguishing between three perspectives of risk-based regulation—namely, of the regulated entity, the regulated activity, and of the regulator itself (Black, 2010b)—this article aims to propose a meta-regulatory framework to investigate the regulation of risk in the field of personal data protection. Using insights from the institutional development of Brazilian data protection law and comparing it with the GDPR, this study clarifies how each jurisdiction operationalizes risk and provides examples to illustrate how each of the three standpoints may interact with other perspectives. The article supports meta-regulatory debates and research on personal data regulation by providing examples and connecting these categories to the key features of a “riskified” (Spina, 2017; Macenaite, 2017) data protection law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Beijing Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.162061
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Standpoints in Risk-Based Regulation: Applying a Meta-Regulatory Framework to Personal Data Protection

Heloisa Bianquini
Beijing Law Review
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Three Standpoints in Risk-Based Regulation: Applying a Meta-Regulatory Framework to Personal Data Protection

Heloisa Bianquini
article en

Abstract

By distinguishing between three perspectives of risk-based regulation—namely, of the regulated entity, the regulated activity, and of the regulator itself (Black, 2010b)—this article aims to propose a meta-regulatory framework to investigate the regulation of risk in the field of personal data protection. Using insights from the institutional development of Brazilian data protection law and comparing it with the GDPR, this study clarifies how each jurisdiction operationalizes risk and provides examples to illustrate how each of the three standpoints may interact with other perspectives. The article supports meta-regulatory debates and research on personal data regulation by providing examples and connecting these categories to the key features of a “riskified” (Spina, 2017; Macenaite, 2017) data protection law.

Beijing Law ReviewVol. 16(02)
Instituto do Sono (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.