The COGNITIVE BIASES, COPING MECHANISMS AND SYMPTOM SEVERITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH OCD TENDENCIES

Abstract This study explores the cognitive biases, coping mechanisms, and symptom severity among individuals with OCD tendencies. A sample of 200 participants, aged 16-45, was recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. A correlational research design was employed. Participants were initially screened using the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI- R). Coping mechanisms included Adaptive Coping and Maladaptive Coping, with Adaptive Coping showing significant skewness. Symptom severity measures, Obsessions, and Compulsions, demonstrated normal distributions. Pearson correlations revealed significant positive relationships between cognitive biases and symptom severity. Multiple Hierarchical regression analysis, explaining 30% of the variance in obsessions, found Importance/Control of Thoughts as a significant predictor (B = .23, p < .01). Adding coping mechanisms in Step 2 increased the explained variance to 36% with Maladaptive Coping emerging as a significant predictor of obsession severity (B = .48, p < .01). For compulsions, the model explained 36.2% of the variance, with Perfectionism/Certainty (B = .28, p < .001) and Maladaptive Coping (B = .63, p < .001) significantly predicting severity. These results highlight the significant role of maladaptive coping strategies and specific cognitive biases, in predicting symptom severity in OCD. Targeted interventions focusing on these factors may be beneficial for managing OCD symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arts & Social Sciences (JASS)
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46662/jass.v12i1.528
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The COGNITIVE BIASES, COPING MECHANISMS AND SYMPTOM SEVERITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH OCD TENDENCIES

Afreen Fatima, Afsheen Gul
Journal of Arts & Social Sciences (JASS)
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

The COGNITIVE BIASES, COPING MECHANISMS AND SYMPTOM SEVERITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH OCD TENDENCIES

Afreen Fatima, Afsheen Gul
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the cognitive biases, coping mechanisms, and symptom severity among individuals with OCD tendencies. A sample of 200 participants, aged 16-45, was recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. A correlational research design was employed. Participants were initially screened using the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI- R). Coping mechanisms included Adaptive Coping and Maladaptive Coping, with Adaptive Coping showing significant skewness. Symptom severity measures, Obsessions, and Compulsions, demonstrated normal distributions. Pearson correlations revealed significant positive relationships between cognitive biases and symptom severity. Multiple Hierarchical regression analysis, explaining 30% of the variance in obsessions, found Importance/Control of Thoughts as a significant predictor (B = .23, p < .01). Adding coping mechanisms in Step 2 increased the explained variance to 36% with Maladaptive Coping emerging as a significant predictor of obsession severity (B = .48, p < .01). For compulsions, the model explained 36.2% of the variance, with Perfectionism/Certainty (B = .28, p < .001) and Maladaptive Coping (B = .63, p < .001) significantly predicting severity. These results highlight the significant role of maladaptive coping strategies and specific cognitive biases, in predicting symptom severity in OCD. Targeted interventions focusing on these factors may be beneficial for managing OCD symptoms.

Journal of Arts & Social Sciences (JASS)Vol. 12(1)
Kinnaird College for Women University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.