Voluntary carbon market and standard setters: lessons from financial regulation

Abstract Standard setters are private entities responsible for certifying that the carbon credits traded on the voluntary market correspond to genuine greenhouse-gas mitigation. Recently, they have been empowered to confer regulatory benefits through their certifications. For example, in several jurisdictions, emitters receive tax reductions when they purchase carbon credits approved by these bodies. In this contribution, we draw on the finance literature to provide reasons suggesting that granting standard setters such power may exacerbate greenwashing in the voluntary carbon market and undermine the regulatory mechanisms that depend on carbon credits. We conclude by proposing practical measures that could help address these challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adea35
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voluntary carbon market and standard setters: lessons from financial regulation

Alberto Quintavalla, Vittoria Battocletti, Alessandro Romano
1 citations
Environmental Research Communications
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
article

Voluntary carbon market and standard setters: lessons from financial regulation

Alberto Quintavalla, Vittoria Battocletti, Alessandro Romano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Standard setters are private entities responsible for certifying that the carbon credits traded on the voluntary market correspond to genuine greenhouse-gas mitigation. Recently, they have been empowered to confer regulatory benefits through their certifications. For example, in several jurisdictions, emitters receive tax reductions when they purchase carbon credits approved by these bodies. In this contribution, we draw on the finance literature to provide reasons suggesting that granting standard setters such power may exacerbate greenwashing in the voluntary carbon market and undermine the regulatory mechanisms that depend on carbon credits. We conclude by proposing practical measures that could help address these challenges.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 7(7)
Bocconi University (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.