Codifying Deliberative Democracy within the EU in the Digital Era

The main objective of this paper is to analyse the necessity of institutionalizing deliberative democracy processes in the framework of EU democracies. The rationale behind this paper comes from the fact that governments have been experimenting with innovative practices in the field of deliberative democracy to in order to make the public participate in decision-making. However, these experimental practices do not create citizens’ entitlements, nor public power duties. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of the importance of coming up with a set of legal standards, based on the EU acquis, in order to guarantee democratic cohesion when codifying the functioning and operation of deliberative democracy, anticipating the potential impact of AI-supported deliberative methods. The hypothesis is that codification and institutionalization of deliberative democracy is necessary to preserve democratic cohesion among EU member states and also to guarantee citizens’ entitlements. As for methodology, data collection and data analysis constitute the bulk of the research. Data collection relies on literature, and EU legislation. Data analysis is based on legal reasoning, mainly. The conclusion is that citizens’ participation needs to be secured and guaranteed by means of a set of core principles based on the EU acquis in order to preserve democratic cohesion among member states. Otherwise, no rights are conferred to citizens and deliberative processes operate at the discretion of public authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37075//bjiep.2025.1.01
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Codifying Deliberative Democracy within the EU in the Digital Era

María Jesús García García
Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics
Social Media and Politics
article

Codifying Deliberative Democracy within the EU in the Digital Era

María Jesús García García
article en

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to analyse the necessity of institutionalizing deliberative democracy processes in the framework of EU democracies. The rationale behind this paper comes from the fact that governments have been experimenting with innovative practices in the field of deliberative democracy to in order to make the public participate in decision-making. However, these experimental practices do not create citizens’ entitlements, nor public power duties. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of the importance of coming up with a set of legal standards, based on the EU acquis, in order to guarantee democratic cohesion when codifying the functioning and operation of deliberative democracy, anticipating the potential impact of AI-supported deliberative methods. The hypothesis is that codification and institutionalization of deliberative democracy is necessary to preserve democratic cohesion among EU member states and also to guarantee citizens’ entitlements. As for methodology, data collection and data analysis constitute the bulk of the research. Data collection relies on literature, and EU legislation. Data analysis is based on legal reasoning, mainly. The conclusion is that citizens’ participation needs to be secured and guaranteed by means of a set of core principles based on the EU acquis in order to preserve democratic cohesion among member states. Otherwise, no rights are conferred to citizens and deliberative processes operate at the discretion of public authorities.

Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and PoliticsVol. 5(1)
Universitat de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.