CEDAR-GPP: spatiotemporally upscaled estimates of gross primary productivity incorporating CO <sub>2</sub> fertilization

Abstract. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the largest carbon flux in the Earth system, playing a crucial role in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide and providing carbohydrates needed for ecosystem metabolism. Despite the importance of GPP, however, existing estimates present significant uncertainties and discrepancies. A key issue is the underrepresentation of the CO2 fertilization effect, a major factor contributing to the increased terrestrial carbon sink over recent decades. This omission could potentially bias our understanding of ecosystem responses to climate change. Here, we introduce CEDAR-GPP, the first global machine-learning-upscaled GPP product that incorporates the direct CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis. Our product is comprised of monthly GPP estimates and their uncertainty at 0.05° resolution from 1982 to 2020, generated using a comprehensive set of eddy covariance measurements, multi-source satellite observations, climate variables, and machine learning models. Importantly, we used both theoretical and data-driven approaches to incorporate the direct CO2 effects. Our machine learning models effectively predict monthly GPP (R2 ∼ 0.72), the mean seasonal cycles (R2 ∼ 0.77), and spatial variabilities (R2 ∼ 0.63) based on cross-validation at flux sites. After incorporating the direct CO2 effects, the predicted long-term GPP trend across global flux towers substantially increases from 3.1 to 4.5–5.4 gC m−2 yr−1, which aligns more closely with the 7.7 gC m−2 yr−1 trend detected from eddy covariance data. While the global patterns of annual mean GPP, seasonality, and interannual variability generally align with existing satellite-based products, CEDAR-GPP demonstrates higher long-term trends globally after incorporating CO2 fertilization and reflected a strong temperature control on direct CO2 effects. The estimated global GPP trend is 0.57–0.76 PgC yr−1 from 2001 to 2018 and 0.32–0.34 PgC yr−1 from 1982 to 2018. Estimating and validating GPP trends in data-scarce regions, such as the tropics, remains challenging, underscoring the importance of ongoing ground-based monitoring and advancements in modeling techniques. CEDAR-GPP offers a comprehensive representation of GPP temporal and spatial dynamics, providing valuable insights into ecosystem–climate interactions. The CEDAR-GPP product is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8212706 (Kang et al., 2024).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth system science data
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3009-2025
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEDAR-GPP: spatiotemporally upscaled estimates of gross primary productivity incorporating CO 2 fertilization

Yanghui Kang, Trevor F. Keenan, Max Gaber, Xinchen Lu et al.
4 citations
Earth system science data
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
article

CEDAR-GPP: spatiotemporally upscaled estimates of gross primary productivity incorporating CO 2 fertilization

Yanghui Kang, Trevor F. Keenan, Max Gaber, Xinchen Lu, Maoya Bassiouni
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the largest carbon flux in the Earth system, playing a crucial role in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide and providing carbohydrates needed for ecosystem metabolism. Despite the importance of GPP, however, existing estimates present significant uncertainties and discrepancies. A key issue is the underrepresentation of the CO2 fertilization effect, a major factor contributing to the increased terrestrial carbon sink over recent decades. This omission could potentially bias our understanding of ecosystem responses to climate change. Here, we introduce CEDAR-GPP, the first global machine-learning-upscaled GPP product that incorporates the direct CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis. Our product is comprised of monthly GPP estimates and their uncertainty at 0.05° resolution from 1982 to 2020, generated using a comprehensive set of eddy covariance measurements, multi-source satellite observations, climate variables, and machine learning models. Importantly, we used both theoretical and data-driven approaches to incorporate the direct CO2 effects. Our machine learning models effectively predict monthly GPP (R2 ∼ 0.72), the mean seasonal cycles (R2 ∼ 0.77), and spatial variabilities (R2 ∼ 0.63) based on cross-validation at flux sites. After incorporating the direct CO2 effects, the predicted long-term GPP trend across global flux towers substantially increases from 3.1 to 4.5–5.4 gC m−2 yr−1, which aligns more closely with the 7.7 gC m−2 yr−1 trend detected from eddy covariance data. While the global patterns of annual mean GPP, seasonality, and interannual variability generally align with existing satellite-based products, CEDAR-GPP demonstrates higher long-term trends globally after incorporating CO2 fertilization and reflected a strong temperature control on direct CO2 effects. The estimated global GPP trend is 0.57–0.76 PgC yr−1 from 2001 to 2018 and 0.32–0.34 PgC yr−1 from 1982 to 2018. Estimating and validating GPP trends in data-scarce regions, such as the tropics, remains challenging, underscoring the importance of ongoing ground-based monitoring and advancements in modeling techniques. CEDAR-GPP offers a comprehensive representation of GPP temporal and spatial dynamics, providing valuable insights into ecosystem–climate interactions. The CEDAR-GPP product is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8212706 (Kang et al., 2024).

Earth system science dataVol. 17(6)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Virginia Tech (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.