Comparison of air refractive index formulae when used in telemetry for two-wavelength refractivity compensation

Abstract A two-wavelength absolute distance meter operating at 780 nm and 1560 nm has been developed. It measures two optical path lengths simultaneously, the difference of which enables an in-line refractivity compensation. The result is a dispersion-based air-index-compensated distance independent of temperature and pressure along the optical paths. In previous works, the instrumental errors were evaluated and an uncertainty on the measured optical path lengths was assessed. However, the dispersion-based air-index-compensated distance is not traceable to the SI metre, as its calculation requires parameters derived from the air refractive index formula, the dispersion K ( λ ) and humidity g ( λ ) terms, which are not always associated with uncertainties nor defined for infrared wavelengths. The current article reviews how the refractive index has been defined by various authors, such as Edlén, Ciddor, or Voronin and Zheltikov. We first show that whatever formula is used, it can be applied to two-wavelength telemetry for refractivity compensation. The equivalences between the formulae, as well as their differences, are highlighted. Secondly, we compare the formulae using experimental measurements at 780 nm and 1560 nm for distances up to 6.5 km. For these wavelengths, the Voronin and Zheltikov equation is the one that compensates best changes in air refractive index when a fixed distance is measured over several days, with standard deviations better than 280 µm over 2.6 km or 5.4 km. When other formulae are used for the same measurements, the standard deviations exceed 500 µm. Furthermore, when distances obtained by our two-wavelength ADM are compared with those of a GNSS-based distance meter, the measurements of the two systems are compatible within their uncertainties only if the Voronin and Zheltikov equation is used. Otherwise, there is a scale error higher than 2 ppm. This article shows that these errors arise mainly from the humidity term g ( λ ) in the infrared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrologia
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ade9c5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of air refractive index formulae when used in telemetry for two-wavelength refractivity compensation

Joffray Guillory, Daniel Truong, Jean‐Pierre Wallerand
2 citations
Metrologia
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
1.43
article

Comparison of air refractive index formulae when used in telemetry for two-wavelength refractivity compensation

Joffray Guillory, Daniel Truong, Jean‐Pierre Wallerand
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract A two-wavelength absolute distance meter operating at 780 nm and 1560 nm has been developed. It measures two optical path lengths simultaneously, the difference of which enables an in-line refractivity compensation. The result is a dispersion-based air-index-compensated distance independent of temperature and pressure along the optical paths. In previous works, the instrumental errors were evaluated and an uncertainty on the measured optical path lengths was assessed. However, the dispersion-based air-index-compensated distance is not traceable to the SI metre, as its calculation requires parameters derived from the air refractive index formula, the dispersion K ( λ ) and humidity g ( λ ) terms, which are not always associated with uncertainties nor defined for infrared wavelengths. The current article reviews how the refractive index has been defined by various authors, such as Edlén, Ciddor, or Voronin and Zheltikov. We first show that whatever formula is used, it can be applied to two-wavelength telemetry for refractivity compensation. The equivalences between the formulae, as well as their differences, are highlighted. Secondly, we compare the formulae using experimental measurements at 780 nm and 1560 nm for distances up to 6.5 km. For these wavelengths, the Voronin and Zheltikov equation is the one that compensates best changes in air refractive index when a fixed distance is measured over several days, with standard deviations better than 280 µm over 2.6 km or 5.4 km. When other formulae are used for the same measurements, the standard deviations exceed 500 µm. Furthermore, when distances obtained by our two-wavelength ADM are compared with those of a GNSS-based distance meter, the measurements of the two systems are compatible within their uncertainties only if the Voronin and Zheltikov equation is used. Otherwise, there is a scale error higher than 2 ppm. This article shows that these errors arise mainly from the humidity term g ( λ ) in the infrared.

MetrologiaVol. 62(4)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR)
CERN, Politechnika Warszawska, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation, European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.