Non-solvents as physical blowing agents in printable silicone foams

Silicone foams were produced by dispersing an incompatible liquid phase (i.e. a non-solvent) into an uncured, liquid silicone. The formulation and processing parameters were varied to see the effect on porosity and pore morphology. Specifically, two fluorosilanes were added to stabilize the inclusion of fluorinated solvents as blowing agents. As the floruosilane content increased, the void content increased up to about 44 vol. % when the fluorosilane comprised 18 wt. % of the initial formulation. Fumed silica that was treated with a fluorinated silane was also used to try to stabilize the dispersed liquid. While the fumed silica content did not have a strong effect on the total void content, the morphology changed when silica content changed. Various fluorinated solvents with distinct chemical structures were used as the non-solvent and then removed after curing of the silicone. The interaction of the internal non-solvent phase and the silicone phase was expected to influence the porosity. These insights highlight how the manipulation of formulation and processing parameters, focusing on the inclusion of fluorosilanes and fluorinated solvents, contributes to the understanding of how incompatible liquid phases interact with silicone matrices to control porosity and pore morphology. Additionally, these interactions also influenced processability, leading to formulations that could be printed. Higher content of non-solvent inclusions could increase the yield stress and storage modulus of an uncured formulation, leading to the ability to tune intrastrand porosity while a 3D printed architecture could be modified to introduce porosity between the strands. In addition to fluorinated solvents, we also considered non-fluorinated solvents since these may be more industrially relevant in the future. Overall, this approach provides an alternative route to producing porous foams that can be 3D printed, which could be useful for applications like cushioning and protective gear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/adea03
Primary Topic
Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-solvents as physical blowing agents in printable silicone foams

Nhi V. Quach, Jeremy M. Lenhardt, Michael J. Ford, Steven D. Smith et al.
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
article

Non-solvents as physical blowing agents in printable silicone foams

Nhi V. Quach, Jeremy M. Lenhardt, Michael J. Ford, Steven D. Smith, L. Ghanbari, Colin K. Loeb
article en

Abstract

Silicone foams were produced by dispersing an incompatible liquid phase (i.e. a non-solvent) into an uncured, liquid silicone. The formulation and processing parameters were varied to see the effect on porosity and pore morphology. Specifically, two fluorosilanes were added to stabilize the inclusion of fluorinated solvents as blowing agents. As the floruosilane content increased, the void content increased up to about 44 vol. % when the fluorosilane comprised 18 wt. % of the initial formulation. Fumed silica that was treated with a fluorinated silane was also used to try to stabilize the dispersed liquid. While the fumed silica content did not have a strong effect on the total void content, the morphology changed when silica content changed. Various fluorinated solvents with distinct chemical structures were used as the non-solvent and then removed after curing of the silicone. The interaction of the internal non-solvent phase and the silicone phase was expected to influence the porosity. These insights highlight how the manipulation of formulation and processing parameters, focusing on the inclusion of fluorosilanes and fluorinated solvents, contributes to the understanding of how incompatible liquid phases interact with silicone matrices to control porosity and pore morphology. Additionally, these interactions also influenced processability, leading to formulations that could be printed. Higher content of non-solvent inclusions could increase the yield stress and storage modulus of an uncured formulation, leading to the ability to tune intrastrand porosity while a 3D printed architecture could be modified to introduce porosity between the strands. In addition to fluorinated solvents, we also considered non-fluorinated solvents since these may be more industrially relevant in the future. Overall, this approach provides an alternative route to producing porous foams that can be 3D printed, which could be useful for applications like cushioning and protective gear.

Journal of Physics Condensed MatterVol. 37(28)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.