Grammatical Relations in Southern Wakashan Locative Affixation

Southern Wakashan languages (Makah, Nuuchahnulth, Ditidaht) commonly express location concepts with so-called “restrictive” locative suffixes attached to nouns, verbs, and other kinds of morphological bases. This paper examines the syntax of clauses with a restrictive locative suffix as the sole clausal predicator. Four construction types are identified, distinguished by four possible combinations of morphological base and linking pattern of suffixal arguments (Figure and Ground) to grammatical functions. The flexibility of subject linking is argued to follow from the regular transitive linking rules with the crucial difference that, unlike two-place verbs, restrictive locative suffixes do not lexically differentiate their arguments by agency. The variation in morphological base type is shown to be sensitive to the information status of the Figure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of American Linguistics
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735658
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grammatical Relations in Southern Wakashan Locative Affixation

Matthew Davidson
International Journal of American Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Grammatical Relations in Southern Wakashan Locative Affixation

Matthew Davidson
article en

Abstract

Southern Wakashan languages (Makah, Nuuchahnulth, Ditidaht) commonly express location concepts with so-called “restrictive” locative suffixes attached to nouns, verbs, and other kinds of morphological bases. This paper examines the syntax of clauses with a restrictive locative suffix as the sole clausal predicator. Four construction types are identified, distinguished by four possible combinations of morphological base and linking pattern of suffixal arguments (Figure and Ground) to grammatical functions. The flexibility of subject linking is argued to follow from the regular transitive linking rules with the crucial difference that, unlike two-place verbs, restrictive locative suffixes do not lexically differentiate their arguments by agency. The variation in morphological base type is shown to be sensitive to the information status of the Figure.

International Journal of American LinguisticsVol. 91(3)
California State University, Long Beach (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.