Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication

Current information ecologies present unique opportunities to communicate science and engage diverse publics in science. Unfortunately, they also present unique challenges. Here, we outline how the public sphere for science is transforming as media evolve, and we connect these changes to the high-stakes issue context of COVID-19. We argue that scientific organizations' struggles to adapt to evolving media are linked, in part, to asymmetries in which social media platforms prevent researchers from producing reliable data that could inform institutional change and improve science communication. This has been apparent in studies of echo chambers and filter bubbles. Producing a more usable evidence base, we conclude, will require that scholars a) obtain access to proprietary data, b) reconceptualize information ecologies as social systems, c) avoid ceding core research tasks to platforms, d) address ethical issues, and e) grapple with the urgency of moving forward productively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400928121
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
54.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication

Isabelle Freiling, Dietram A. Scheufele, Nicole M. Krause
13 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
54.62
article

Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication

Isabelle Freiling, Dietram A. Scheufele, Nicole M. Krause
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Current information ecologies present unique opportunities to communicate science and engage diverse publics in science. Unfortunately, they also present unique challenges. Here, we outline how the public sphere for science is transforming as media evolve, and we connect these changes to the high-stakes issue context of COVID-19. We argue that scientific organizations' struggles to adapt to evolving media are linked, in part, to asymmetries in which social media platforms prevent researchers from producing reliable data that could inform institutional change and improve science communication. This has been apparent in studies of echo chambers and filter bubbles. Producing a more usable evidence base, we conclude, will require that scholars a) obtain access to proprietary data, b) reconceptualize information ecologies as social systems, c) avoid ceding core research tasks to platforms, d) address ethical issues, and e) grapple with the urgency of moving forward productively.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(27)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Utah (US), Morgridge Institute for Research (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
54.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.