Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses

Abstract Psychological reactance is one of the underlying mechanisms of message effects on persuasion outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses across 28 articles, comprising 33 studies and 146 effect sizes (2005–2024), to examine (a) message effects on psychological reactance and (b) the influence of psychological reactance on persuasion outcomes. Results showed that high freedom-threatening language increased anger (k = 28, r = .21), negative cognitions (k = 25, r = .17), and psychological reactance (k = 53, r = .20) compared to low freedom-threatening language. These effects were moderated by behavior repetitiveness and communication modality. However, gain vs. loss framing showed no significant differences in anger (k = 6, r = –.03), negative cognitions (k = 6, r = –.01), or psychological reactance (k = 12, r = –.02). Both anger (r = –.23, k = 42) and negative cognitions (r = –.18, k = 39) were negatively associated with persuasion outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Communication Research
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf016
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
136.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses

Zixi Li, Jingyuan Shi
9 citations
Human Communication Research
Media Influence and Health
136.58
article

Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses

Zixi Li, Jingyuan Shi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Psychological reactance is one of the underlying mechanisms of message effects on persuasion outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses across 28 articles, comprising 33 studies and 146 effect sizes (2005–2024), to examine (a) message effects on psychological reactance and (b) the influence of psychological reactance on persuasion outcomes. Results showed that high freedom-threatening language increased anger (k = 28, r = .21), negative cognitions (k = 25, r = .17), and psychological reactance (k = 53, r = .20) compared to low freedom-threatening language. These effects were moderated by behavior repetitiveness and communication modality. However, gain vs. loss framing showed no significant differences in anger (k = 6, r = –.03), negative cognitions (k = 6, r = –.01), or psychological reactance (k = 12, r = –.02). Both anger (r = –.23, k = 42) and negative cognitions (r = –.18, k = 39) were negatively associated with persuasion outcomes.

Human Communication ResearchVol. 52(1)
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Media Influence and Health
136.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.