Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration

This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000043047
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Elif Şahin, Sebile Çomçalı, Burcu Polat Gültekin
Medicine
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Elif Şahin, Sebile Çomçalı, Burcu Polat Gültekin
article en

Abstract

This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.

MedicineVol. 104(26)
Izmir University (TR), Bilkent University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.