Evaluation of radiological data for three-dimensonal physical models to assist personalized anesthesia in neuroaxial interventions with difficult anatomy

The objective of this study is to compare conventional anesthesia practices with the use of a preoperative, personalized, life-sized three-dimensional (3D) physical spine model in individuals where neuroaxial anesthesia is anticipated to be challenging due to difficult anatomy as difficult anatomy as the presence of spinal segment fusion, reduced spinal mobility and flexibility, joint stiffness, and movement restriction in the lumbar spine. Twenty individuals aged between 30 and 90, who were expected to undergo neuroaxial anesthesia with a difficult anatomical profile, and who had completed preoperative radiological evaluations, were included in the study. Radiological data were processed using Z-Suite software and printed as solid models with a Zortrax M300 3D printer. The individuals were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a conventional anesthesia group (n = 10) and a 3D model-assisted anesthesia group (n = 10). The number of successful attempts during epidural/spinal anesthesia procedures was recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The cost of producing each 3D spine model was calculated at $10, using 340 grams of material, with a printing time of 2 days and 11 hours per model. In the 3D model-assisted group, the success rate for anesthesia was 100%, while the success rate in the conventional group was 80%. The first-attempt success rate in the 3D model-assisted group was 80%, compared to 20% in the conventional group. In the conventional group, there were instances where successful anesthesia was not achieved even after 3 or more attempts. The use of 3D models improved the success of epidural/spinal anesthesia in individuals with challenging spinal anatomy during limb surgery. We conclude that 3D modeling can increase the success rate of anesthesia in cases where difficult neuroaxial anatomy is anticipated, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with multiple attempts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000042895
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of radiological data for three-dimensonal physical models to assist personalized anesthesia in neuroaxial interventions with difficult anatomy

Semra Karaman, Figen Govsa, Zeynep Çağıran, Mehmet Asım Özer et al.
Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Evaluation of radiological data for three-dimensonal physical models to assist personalized anesthesia in neuroaxial interventions with difficult anatomy

Semra Karaman, Figen Govsa, Zeynep Çağıran, Mehmet Asım Özer, Nezih Sertoz, Inanc Cagiran
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare conventional anesthesia practices with the use of a preoperative, personalized, life-sized three-dimensional (3D) physical spine model in individuals where neuroaxial anesthesia is anticipated to be challenging due to difficult anatomy as difficult anatomy as the presence of spinal segment fusion, reduced spinal mobility and flexibility, joint stiffness, and movement restriction in the lumbar spine. Twenty individuals aged between 30 and 90, who were expected to undergo neuroaxial anesthesia with a difficult anatomical profile, and who had completed preoperative radiological evaluations, were included in the study. Radiological data were processed using Z-Suite software and printed as solid models with a Zortrax M300 3D printer. The individuals were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a conventional anesthesia group (n = 10) and a 3D model-assisted anesthesia group (n = 10). The number of successful attempts during epidural/spinal anesthesia procedures was recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The cost of producing each 3D spine model was calculated at $10, using 340 grams of material, with a printing time of 2 days and 11 hours per model. In the 3D model-assisted group, the success rate for anesthesia was 100%, while the success rate in the conventional group was 80%. The first-attempt success rate in the 3D model-assisted group was 80%, compared to 20% in the conventional group. In the conventional group, there were instances where successful anesthesia was not achieved even after 3 or more attempts. The use of 3D models improved the success of epidural/spinal anesthesia in individuals with challenging spinal anatomy during limb surgery. We conclude that 3D modeling can increase the success rate of anesthesia in cases where difficult neuroaxial anatomy is anticipated, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with multiple attempts.

MedicineVol. 104(26)
University of Iowa (US), Ege University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.