Introduction:Beyond penal populism: complexifying justice systems and security through qualitative lenses

In the global political landscape, as far-right parties gain prominence, populist rhetoric advocating for harsher justice and security policies is becoming increasingly prevalent. Proponents of this rhetoric base their discourse on “alarming” violence and crime rates and discredit more liberal approaches, as well as research that deconstruct those Manichean visions. In this introduction, we ask what tangible contributions qualitative and ethnographic methods can offer to the field of justice and security studies. We explain why and to what extent qualitative methods are essential to accurately represent the reality of justice and security and to help deconstruct overly simplistic interpretations of justice and security. Ultimately, this article contends that these methodologies are crucial, now more than ever, for dismantling narratives driven by penal populism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Etnografica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/148hk
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction:Beyond penal populism: complexifying justice systems and security through qualitative lenses

Maria João Leote Carvalho, Annabelle Dias Félix, Catarina Fróis
Etnografica
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Introduction:Beyond penal populism: complexifying justice systems and security through qualitative lenses

Maria João Leote Carvalho, Annabelle Dias Félix, Catarina Fróis
article en

Abstract

In the global political landscape, as far-right parties gain prominence, populist rhetoric advocating for harsher justice and security policies is becoming increasingly prevalent. Proponents of this rhetoric base their discourse on “alarming” violence and crime rates and discredit more liberal approaches, as well as research that deconstruct those Manichean visions. In this introduction, we ask what tangible contributions qualitative and ethnographic methods can offer to the field of justice and security studies. We explain why and to what extent qualitative methods are essential to accurately represent the reality of justice and security and to help deconstruct overly simplistic interpretations of justice and security. Ultimately, this article contends that these methodologies are crucial, now more than ever, for dismantling narratives driven by penal populism.

EtnograficaVol. 29 (2)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introduction:Beyond penal populism: complexifying justice systems and security through qualitative lenses — Maria João Leote Carvalho, Annabelle Dias Félix, et al. · Etnografica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS