Adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Acutely ill and Immobilized patients: A Clinical Audit

Background: Thromboprophylaxis is a proven and safe strategy for hospitalized patients. However, many hospitals still don’t use these preventive measures enough, despite their benefits. Objective: To evaluate the risk and adoption of thromboprophylaxis guidelines in acutely ill and immobilized patients in a tertiary care hospital. Method: This prospective observational study was conducted in the medical wards of Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar from April 2021 to September 2022. A total of 4260 patients were hospitalized in medical wards during the study period. The simple random sampling technique allowed the inclusion of 600 patients with equal representation from all the three medical units of HMC. Results: Among the admitted patients, 336 (56%) were females while 264 (44%) were males. Patients stratified as High Risk were 435 (72%) while the remaining 165 (28%) were in Low-risk group. Total 345 (57.5%) patients received Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with 187 (31.2%) in the High-Risk group while 158 (26.4%) in the low-risk group. Amongst these74 (12.3%) patients received both the modalities Thromboembolic Deterrent (TED) Stockings and anticoagulation therapy while remaining 173 (28.6%) received TED Stockings alone, and 101 (16.7%) received anticoagulation therapy alone. Implementation of VTE prophylaxis is estimated to be 31.2% in high-risk group and 26.4% in low-risk group patients. Conclusion: Present investigation revealed substantial underutilization of venous thromboembolisms prophylaxis to seriously ill medical ward patients and emphasize the urgent requirement for amended implementation of current guidelines in hospitals, so as to ensure optimal venous thromboprophylaxis practices and prevent avoidable cases of venous thromboembolism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v39i2.582
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Acutely ill and Immobilized patients: A Clinical Audit

Hafiza Tuseef Sayyar, Tahira Assad, Afsheen Sayyar, Shaista Ambreen et al.
Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Acutely ill and Immobilized patients: A Clinical Audit

Hafiza Tuseef Sayyar, Tahira Assad, Afsheen Sayyar, Shaista Ambreen, Marium Shoukat, Quratulain Mehdi
article en

Abstract

Background: Thromboprophylaxis is a proven and safe strategy for hospitalized patients. However, many hospitals still don’t use these preventive measures enough, despite their benefits. Objective: To evaluate the risk and adoption of thromboprophylaxis guidelines in acutely ill and immobilized patients in a tertiary care hospital. Method: This prospective observational study was conducted in the medical wards of Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar from April 2021 to September 2022. A total of 4260 patients were hospitalized in medical wards during the study period. The simple random sampling technique allowed the inclusion of 600 patients with equal representation from all the three medical units of HMC. Results: Among the admitted patients, 336 (56%) were females while 264 (44%) were males. Patients stratified as High Risk were 435 (72%) while the remaining 165 (28%) were in Low-risk group. Total 345 (57.5%) patients received Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with 187 (31.2%) in the High-Risk group while 158 (26.4%) in the low-risk group. Amongst these74 (12.3%) patients received both the modalities Thromboembolic Deterrent (TED) Stockings and anticoagulation therapy while remaining 173 (28.6%) received TED Stockings alone, and 101 (16.7%) received anticoagulation therapy alone. Implementation of VTE prophylaxis is estimated to be 31.2% in high-risk group and 26.4% in low-risk group patients. Conclusion: Present investigation revealed substantial underutilization of venous thromboembolisms prophylaxis to seriously ill medical ward patients and emphasize the urgent requirement for amended implementation of current guidelines in hospitals, so as to ensure optimal venous thromboprophylaxis practices and prevent avoidable cases of venous thromboembolism.

Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex LahoreVol. 39(2)
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (PK), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), National University of Medical Sciences (PK), Bahria University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.