Accessing Assessment: The Correspondence of Longitudinal Assessment Tools to Grades in a Writing-Intensive Course

Researchers have long cast grades as an unreliable proxy for student learning despite their enduring use in higher education. Grounding assessment instruments in student learning outcomes (SLOs) provides an accurate and accessible means of evaluating student performance and guiding instructional practice. Using a SLO-guided pre-test/post-test assessment instrument, this study evaluated the correspondence between student learning and grades in a writing-intensive, large-lecture communication course. Learning scores were found to be significantly positively associated with final grades and scores on individual assignments. The study further explored differences in learning and grades between online and in-person course formats. Implications for assessment instrument design are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v25i2.36399
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessing Assessment: The Correspondence of Longitudinal Assessment Tools to Grades in a Writing-Intensive Course

Jessica Welch, Christopher C. Roland, Joshua Boyd
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Accessing Assessment: The Correspondence of Longitudinal Assessment Tools to Grades in a Writing-Intensive Course

Jessica Welch, Christopher C. Roland, Joshua Boyd
article en

Abstract

Researchers have long cast grades as an unreliable proxy for student learning despite their enduring use in higher education. Grounding assessment instruments in student learning outcomes (SLOs) provides an accurate and accessible means of evaluating student performance and guiding instructional practice. Using a SLO-guided pre-test/post-test assessment instrument, this study evaluated the correspondence between student learning and grades in a writing-intensive, large-lecture communication course. Learning scores were found to be significantly positively associated with final grades and scores on individual assignments. The study further explored differences in learning and grades between online and in-person course formats. Implications for assessment instrument design are discussed.

Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and LearningVol. 25(2)
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accessing Assessment: The Correspondence of Longitudinal Assessment Tools to Grades in a Writing-Intensive Course — Jessica Welch, Christopher C. Roland, et al. · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS