Development of The Nature of Science Scale for Academics

Background: It is clear that the steps that can bring a perspective to science and enlighten our path with new changes can be provided by academics who have grasped science and the nature of science. The aim of this research is to develop a scale by which the views of academics on the nature of science can be evaluated. Results: The study was carried out with the voluntary participation of 682 academics at four different universities using a quantitative, methodological research design. As a result of the factor analysis, 19 items were grouped under five factors: "Definition of Science," "Systematicity and Reality," "Subjectivity in Science," "Openness to Change," and "Falsifiability in Science." These factors explained 52.709% of the total variance. The scale was found to be reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of 0.615. Conclusions: The Nature of Science Scale for Academics is useful for determining how academics perceive science and its nature, considering the shift from a positivist-objective understanding of science to a subjective one, and the impact of post-modernism on the hierarchical structure of values within cultural codes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Governance and Policy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1696791
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of The Nature of Science Scale for Academics

H. Serhan SARIKAYA, Ömür Şaylıgil
Higher Education Governance and Policy
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Development of The Nature of Science Scale for Academics

H. Serhan SARIKAYA, Ömür Şaylıgil
article en

Abstract

Background: It is clear that the steps that can bring a perspective to science and enlighten our path with new changes can be provided by academics who have grasped science and the nature of science. The aim of this research is to develop a scale by which the views of academics on the nature of science can be evaluated. Results: The study was carried out with the voluntary participation of 682 academics at four different universities using a quantitative, methodological research design. As a result of the factor analysis, 19 items were grouped under five factors: "Definition of Science," "Systematicity and Reality," "Subjectivity in Science," "Openness to Change," and "Falsifiability in Science." These factors explained 52.709% of the total variance. The scale was found to be reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of 0.615. Conclusions: The Nature of Science Scale for Academics is useful for determining how academics perceive science and its nature, considering the shift from a positivist-objective understanding of science to a subjective one, and the impact of post-modernism on the hierarchical structure of values within cultural codes.

Higher Education Governance and PolicyVol. 6(1)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Kutahya Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.