Rural-Urban Patterns in Household Rules Limiting Combustible Tobacco, Noncombustible Tobacco, and E-Cigarette Use

<b>Rationale:</b> Rural Americans experience higher rates of smoking and smoking-associated disease than urban Americans. Household rules limiting smoking inside the home decrease secondhand smoke exposure and may facilitate quitting among those who smoke. Limited research suggests that rural Americans are less likely to report household smoking restrictions. <b>Objective:</b> To study the relationship between rurality and household rules limiting combustible tobacco, noncombustible tobacco, and electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional data for 10,126 U.S. respondents aged ⩾40 years from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 5 (2018-2019) were used to assess the relationship between residence rurality (rural, small town, suburban, urban) and household rules limiting combustible tobacco, noncombustible tobacco, or e-cigarette use. Multivariable Poisson regression analyses were adjusted for respondent age, sex, race, education, family income, and product use. <b>Results:</b> Rural (vs. urban) respondents more commonly allowed combustible tobacco (17.6% vs. 13.6%), noncombustible tobacco (26.4% vs. 16.4%), and e-cigarette use (20.8% vs. 15.1%) in the home. The fully adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) for rural (vs. urban) homes were 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12, 1.44) for combustible tobacco, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.20, 1.54) for noncombustible tobacco, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.17, 1.55) for e-cigarettes. Small-town respondents had similarly increased ARRs, whereas suburban respondents' ARRs were not different from the urban reference group's. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural and small-town Americans were more likely than urban respondents to allow household use of all tobacco product types. This pattern persisted when adjusted for socioeconomic factors and respondent product use. These findings may help address tobacco-related diseases that disproportionately affect rural Americans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202504-419oc
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural-Urban Patterns in Household Rules Limiting Combustible Tobacco, Noncombustible Tobacco, and E-Cigarette Use

Jenny E. Ozga, Zhiqun Tang, Cassandra A. Stanton, James D. Sargent et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Rural-Urban Patterns in Household Rules Limiting Combustible Tobacco, Noncombustible Tobacco, and E-Cigarette Use

Jenny E. Ozga, Zhiqun Tang, Cassandra A. Stanton, James D. Sargent, Alexander W. Steinberg, Laura M. Paulin
article en

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Rural Americans experience higher rates of smoking and smoking-associated disease than urban Americans. Household rules limiting smoking inside the home decrease secondhand smoke exposure and may facilitate quitting among those who smoke. Limited research suggests that rural Americans are less likely to report household smoking restrictions. <b>Objective:</b> To study the relationship between rurality and household rules limiting combustible tobacco, noncombustible tobacco, and electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional data for 10,126 U.S. respondents aged ⩾40 years from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 5 (2018-2019) were used to assess the relationship between residence rurality (rural, small town, suburban, urban) and household rules limiting combustible tobacco, noncombustible tobacco, or e-cigarette use. Multivariable Poisson regression analyses were adjusted for respondent age, sex, race, education, family income, and product use. <b>Results:</b> Rural (vs. urban) respondents more commonly allowed combustible tobacco (17.6% vs. 13.6%), noncombustible tobacco (26.4% vs. 16.4%), and e-cigarette use (20.8% vs. 15.1%) in the home. The fully adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) for rural (vs. urban) homes were 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12, 1.44) for combustible tobacco, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.20, 1.54) for noncombustible tobacco, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.17, 1.55) for e-cigarettes. Small-town respondents had similarly increased ARRs, whereas suburban respondents' ARRs were not different from the urban reference group's. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rural and small-town Americans were more likely than urban respondents to allow household use of all tobacco product types. This pattern persisted when adjusted for socioeconomic factors and respondent product use. These findings may help address tobacco-related diseases that disproportionately affect rural Americans.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(12)
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Westat (United States) (US), University of Washington (US), Data Sciences International (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.