The Remodeling of the Continuous Cash Benefit Social Policy by the Judiciary

Due to organized civil movements, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 provided for a series of civil rights. Among them, the benefit of continuing provision of a minimum wage to the elderly and to the disabled that could not provide for themselves, or by their families, irrespective of any contribution from the State. The judiciary’s participation in the growth of the number of beneficiaries goes far beyond the concessions resulting from stricto sensu decisions, as by casuistically reinterpreting the law in thousands of cases, it ultimately leads to an imbalance in politics, forcing the other two Branches to adapt. Thus, new laws emerge from that recent jurisprudence. Although the demand comes from the quest for equality, given the limits of the available public resources, it ends up harming the State’s political and financial agenda. It also leads to the illegitimate usurpation of the right to rule of the Legislative and Executive Branches, as the real possibilities in policy implementation – especially the ones that are programmatic in nature – cannot be technically analyzed, despite they demand economic and social planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista ANPPREV de Seguridade Social.
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70444/2966-330x.v2.n1.002
Primary Topic
Marriage and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Remodeling of the Continuous Cash Benefit Social Policy by the Judiciary

Adriana Venturini
Revista ANPPREV de Seguridade Social.
Marriage and Family Dynamics
article

The Remodeling of the Continuous Cash Benefit Social Policy by the Judiciary

Adriana Venturini
article en

Abstract

Due to organized civil movements, the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 provided for a series of civil rights. Among them, the benefit of continuing provision of a minimum wage to the elderly and to the disabled that could not provide for themselves, or by their families, irrespective of any contribution from the State. The judiciary’s participation in the growth of the number of beneficiaries goes far beyond the concessions resulting from stricto sensu decisions, as by casuistically reinterpreting the law in thousands of cases, it ultimately leads to an imbalance in politics, forcing the other two Branches to adapt. Thus, new laws emerge from that recent jurisprudence. Although the demand comes from the quest for equality, given the limits of the available public resources, it ends up harming the State’s political and financial agenda. It also leads to the illegitimate usurpation of the right to rule of the Legislative and Executive Branches, as the real possibilities in policy implementation – especially the ones that are programmatic in nature – cannot be technically analyzed, despite they demand economic and social planning.

Revista ANPPREV de Seguridade Social.Vol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Marriage and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.