Patient Satisfaction and Perception with Digital Complete Dentures Compared to Conventional Complete Dentures—A Pilot Study

<b>Background:</b> Patient satisfaction is a critical outcome in the rehabilitation of edentulous patients. While conventional fabrication methods are widely used, digital workflows are emerging as viable alternatives. However, direct comparative evidence from the patient's perspective remains limited. <b>Objective:</b> To compare patient satisfaction between conventional complete dentures (C-CD) and digital complete dentures (D-CD) in maxillary edentulous patients, including changes in perceptions over time and final prosthesis preference. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted in 2023-2024 involving 40 completely maxillary edentulous patients meeting specific inclusion criteria. Participants were randomly allocated into two sequence groups: Group 1 (n = 20) received C-CD first, and Group 2 (n = 20) received D-CD first, each for 6 months (T1), followed by crossover to the alternate denture for another 6 months (T2). Patient satisfaction was measured using a 10-item questionnaire at 6 and 12 months. <b>Statistical analysis:</b> Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for within-subject comparisons of denture types, and Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons, with significance set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Using the paired crossover analysis, D-CD showed significantly better comfort than C-CD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). D-CD scored significantly higher than C-CD in most satisfaction domains, including comfort, retention, speech, esthetics, and need for adjustments (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Median scores for retention, speech, esthetics, and other domains were slightly higher with D-CD but did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Additionally, the D-CD required fewer post-insertion adjustment visits than the C-CD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). By the end of the trial, 28 patients (70%) preferred the digital denture as their final prosthesis, whereas 12 patients (30%) preferred the conventional denture. <b>Conclusions:</b> Incorporating digital technology in the fabrication of complete dentures significantly enhances patient satisfaction compared to conventional methods. This study highlights the clinical relevance of modern dental prosthesis technology and supports the wider integration of digital workflows. Within the limitations of this pilot study, digitally fabricated complete dentures provided overall patient satisfaction comparable to conventional dentures, with the D-CD offering a notable improvement in comfort. The majority of patients ultimately favored the digital denture, supporting the clinical viability of CAD/CAM workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13070291
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Satisfaction and Perception with Digital Complete Dentures Compared to Conventional Complete Dentures—A Pilot Study

Andrea Bors, Gabriela Bereşescu, Liana Bereșescu, Melinda Székely et al.
2 citations
Dentistry Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
article

Patient Satisfaction and Perception with Digital Complete Dentures Compared to Conventional Complete Dentures—A Pilot Study

Andrea Bors, Gabriela Bereşescu, Liana Bereșescu, Melinda Székely, Alexandra Maier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Patient satisfaction is a critical outcome in the rehabilitation of edentulous patients. While conventional fabrication methods are widely used, digital workflows are emerging as viable alternatives. However, direct comparative evidence from the patient's perspective remains limited. <b>Objective:</b> To compare patient satisfaction between conventional complete dentures (C-CD) and digital complete dentures (D-CD) in maxillary edentulous patients, including changes in perceptions over time and final prosthesis preference. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted in 2023-2024 involving 40 completely maxillary edentulous patients meeting specific inclusion criteria. Participants were randomly allocated into two sequence groups: Group 1 (n = 20) received C-CD first, and Group 2 (n = 20) received D-CD first, each for 6 months (T1), followed by crossover to the alternate denture for another 6 months (T2). Patient satisfaction was measured using a 10-item questionnaire at 6 and 12 months. <b>Statistical analysis:</b> Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for within-subject comparisons of denture types, and Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons, with significance set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Using the paired crossover analysis, D-CD showed significantly better comfort than C-CD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). D-CD scored significantly higher than C-CD in most satisfaction domains, including comfort, retention, speech, esthetics, and need for adjustments (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Median scores for retention, speech, esthetics, and other domains were slightly higher with D-CD but did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Additionally, the D-CD required fewer post-insertion adjustment visits than the C-CD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). By the end of the trial, 28 patients (70%) preferred the digital denture as their final prosthesis, whereas 12 patients (30%) preferred the conventional denture. <b>Conclusions:</b> Incorporating digital technology in the fabrication of complete dentures significantly enhances patient satisfaction compared to conventional methods. This study highlights the clinical relevance of modern dental prosthesis technology and supports the wider integration of digital workflows. Within the limitations of this pilot study, digitally fabricated complete dentures provided overall patient satisfaction comparable to conventional dentures, with the D-CD offering a notable improvement in comfort. The majority of patients ultimately favored the digital denture, supporting the clinical viability of CAD/CAM workflows.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(7)
Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.